LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is used to evaluate the environmental profile of a product or process from its origin to its final destination. In this paper we used LCA to evaluate the current situation of a wastewater treatment plant and identify improvement alternatives. Currently, the highest environmental impacts are caused by the stages of the plant with the highest energy consumption, the use of biogas from anaerobic digestion (95% burned in torch) and the final destination of the sludge (98.6% for agricultural use and 1.4% for compost). We propose four alternatives for biogas applications and five alternatives for sludge applications and compare them to the current situation. The alternatives were incorporated in a decision support system to identify and prioritize the most positive environmental option. Using biogas to produce electricity or a combination of electricity and heat provided the best environmental options since the energy produced would be enough to supply all the stages of the plant, thus reducing their environmental impact. The best environmental option for the final destination of the sludge is to combine the current situation (fertilizer replacement) with use of the sludge in a cement plant (as a replacement for fuel and raw material).

[1]  S. Molander,et al.  Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems : Influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads , 2000 .

[2]  M. T. Moreira,et al.  Environmental performance of a municipal wastewater treatment plant , 2004 .

[3]  S Lundie,et al.  Integrated environmental assessment of tertiary and residuals treatment--LCA in the wastewater industry. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Hybrid life-cycle environmental and cost inventory of sewage sludge treatment and end-use scenarios: a case study from China. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Anastasia Zabaniotou,et al.  Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods--A review , 2008 .

[6]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of processes for the treatment of wastewater urban sludge: energy and global warming analysis , 2005 .

[7]  A. Baky,et al.  Wastewater management integrated with farming –an environmental systems analysis of a Swedish country town , 2006 .

[8]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems – researchers and indicator users in a co-operative case study , 2005 .

[9]  Morgan Fröling,et al.  Environmental assessment of supercritical water oxidation of sewage sludge , 2004 .

[10]  Patrick Rousseaux,et al.  An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios , 2002 .

[11]  Donghee Park,et al.  Environmental and economic feasibility study of a total wastewater treatment network system. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town , 2007 .

[13]  Sixto Malato,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a coupled solar photocatalytic-biological process for wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[14]  A. Hospido,et al.  Environmental Evaluation of Different Treatment Processes for Sludge from Urban Wastewater Treatments: Anaerobic Digestion versus Thermal Processes (10 pp) , 2005 .

[15]  M. Pons,et al.  Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA , 2008 .

[16]  Marie-Noëlle Pons,et al.  SFGP 2007 - The Effects of Sludge Digester Biogas Recovery on WWTP Ecological Impacts and Exergetic Balance , 2008 .