Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: A visual world study of pronoun resolution

Recent evidence from adult pronoun comprehension suggests that semantic factors such as verb transitivity affect referent salience and thereby anaphora resolution. We tested whether the same semantic factors influence pronoun comprehension in young children. In a visual world study, 3-year-olds heard stories that began with a sentence containing either a high or a low transitivity verb. Looking behaviour to pictures depicting the subject and object of this sentence was recorded as children listened to a subsequent sentence containing a pronoun. Children showed a stronger preference to look to the subject as opposed to the object antecedent in the low transitivity condition. In addition there were general preferences (1) to look to the subject in both conditions and (2) to look more at both potential antecedents in the high transitivity condition. This suggests that children, like adults, are affected by semantic factors, specifically semantic prominence, when interpreting anaphoric pronouns.

[1]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[2]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[3]  T. Givon Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[4]  T. Givón,et al.  Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study , 1983 .

[5]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[6]  Mira Ariel Referring and accessibility , 1988, Journal of Linguistics.

[7]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[8]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[9]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[10]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. , 1993 .

[12]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .

[13]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[15]  David A. Patterson,et al.  The Role of Performance , 1994 .

[16]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[17]  A. Almor Noun-phrase anaphora and focus : The informational load hypothesis , 1999 .

[18]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  A. Almor,et al.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.

[20]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[21]  J. Oberlander,et al.  Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations , 2000 .

[22]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .

[23]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[24]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[25]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production , 2003, Cognition.

[26]  G. Altmann,et al.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm , 2005, Cognition.

[27]  C. Fisher,et al.  Who’s “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns☆ , 2005 .

[28]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events , 2005, Cognition.

[29]  Ralph L. Rose,et al.  The relative contribution of syntactic and semantic prominence to the salience of discourse entities , 2005 .

[30]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution , 2005, Psychological science.

[31]  J. V. Berkum,et al.  On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking , 2006 .

[32]  E. Kako Thematic role properties of subjects and objects , 2006, Cognition.

[33]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  M. Grice,et al.  The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements , 2006, Cognition.

[35]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension , 2007 .

[36]  G. Altmann,et al.  The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing , 2007 .

[37]  C. Fisher,et al.  Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. , 2007, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.

[38]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements , 2007 .

[39]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[40]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Put in last position something previously unmentioned: Word order effects on referential expectancy and reference comprehension , 2008 .

[41]  G. Altmann,et al.  Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye movements and mental representation , 2009, Cognition.

[42]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. , 2010, Experimental psychology.