Off‐line sentence processing: What is involved in answering a comprehension probe?

The aim of this study was to better characterize the influence of the comprehension probe on syntax‐related activation patterns observed in fMRI studies of sentence comprehension. In this study, sentence comprehension was assessed by presenting a true/false statement after each sentence. To disassociate the sentence reading from the comprehension probe activation, a 6‐s delay was placed between these processing phases. Two factors were manipulated, one affected the sentence and the other affected the probe. The sentences were manipulated by varying their syntactic complexity; conjoined‐active and object‐relative sentences were examined. The comprehension probes asked whether one of the first two mentioned nouns in the preceding sentence performed the action of one of the two verbs. The probes were manipulated by varying the distance (number of intervening words) between the noun and verb within the sentence; there were three probe types: short distance, long distance, and false statements. The results, which focused on the processing taking place during the probe, showed that the distance manipulation resulted in significant differences in both behavioral and brain activation measures. This was particularly true of BA 44, which revealed an interaction between complexity and distance such that the complexity effect was all but eliminated for the long‐distance condition. Additionally, we replicated our previous finding of syntactic complexity effects during the probe phase. Finally, post hoc analysis revealed that participants used two distinct strategies during sentence reading; significant effects of strategy use on both behavioral and brain activation data were observed. Hum Brain Mapp 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Cognitive Subtractions May Not Add Up: The Interaction between Semantic Processing and Response Mode , 1997, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. Just,et al.  The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  G. Waters,et al.  Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event‐related fMRI study of relative clauses , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[4]  E E Smith,et al.  The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[6]  S. Bookheimer Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  E. Zarahn Testing for Neural Responses during Temporal Components of Trials with BOLD fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[9]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Fiez Phonology, Semantics, and the Role of the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 2022 .

[11]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Common and Distinct Neural Substrates for Pragmatic, Semantic, and Syntactic Processing of Spoken Sentences: An fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  H J Tochon-Danguy,et al.  Updating working memory for words: A PET activation study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Erica B. Michael,et al.  fMRI investigation of sentence comprehension by eye and by ear: Modality fingerprints on cognitive processes , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[20]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  F Kruggel,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response in single‐trial functional MRI experiments , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Yasushi Miyashita,et al.  From Perception to Sentence Comprehension: The Convergence of Auditory and Visual Information of Language in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  Language network specializations: An analysis with parallel task designs and functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  From the Selectedworks of Marcel Adam Just Working Memory and Executive Function: Evidence from Neuroimaging Classic Issues Neuroimaging Results Working Memory and Executive Function: Evidence from Neuroimaging Reconstruals Suggested by the Neuroimaging Data Collaboration and Redundancy , 2022 .

[25]  J. Fiez,et al.  A Comment on the Functional Localization of the Phonological Storage Subsystem of Working Memory , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[26]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Storage and Rehearsal in Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Positron Emission Tomography , 1996 .

[27]  Eric Reuland,et al.  PET studies of language: An assessment of the reliability of the technique , 1994 .

[28]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Role of Parietal Cortex in Verbal Working Memory , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  David Caplan,et al.  Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing , 2008, Cortex.

[30]  A. Ardila,et al.  The role of insula in language: an unsettled question , 1999 .

[31]  D. Schacter,et al.  Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  David Caplan,et al.  Why Is Broca'S Area Involved in Syntax? , 2006, Cortex.

[34]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[37]  B. Postle,et al.  Functional neuroanatomical double dissociation of mnemonic and executive control processes contributing to working memory performance. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[40]  J. Kable,et al.  Neural Substrates of Action Event Knowledge , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  A Common Language Network for Comprehension and Production: A Contribution to the Definition of Language Epicenters with PET , 2000, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A Trial-Based Experimental Design for fMRI , 1997, NeuroImage.

[43]  S. Petersen,et al.  PET activation of posterior temporal regions during auditory word presentation and verb generation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Working Memory and the Establishment of Filler-Gap Dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[45]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Individual Differences in Sentence Comprehension: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Syntactic and Lexical Processing Demands , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation , 1996 .

[47]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[48]  J. Towse,et al.  Individual differences in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[49]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca's area. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[50]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  The Functional Neuroanatomy of Thematic Role and Locative Relational Knowledge , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[52]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[53]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[54]  A. Friederici,et al.  Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[55]  H. Neville,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[56]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory , 1998, Neuroreport.