Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery in Women With Preterm Labor: Analysis of Multiple Proteins in Amniotic and Cervical Fluids

OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether specific proteins in amniotic and cervical fluids, alone or in combination with risk factors, can identify women in preterm labor with intact membranes who will deliver spontaneously within 7 days of sampling. METHODS: In a cohort of 89 women in preterm labor, amniotic and cervical fluids were collected between 22 and 33 weeks of gestation. Twenty-seven proteins were analyzed simultaneously using multiplex technology. Individual levels of each protein were compared and calculations performed to find associations among different proteins, background variables, and spontaneous preterm delivery within 7 days of sampling. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and prediction models were created based on stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: We found two multivariable models that predicted spontaneous preterm delivery better than any single variable. One combined multivariable prediction model was based on amniotic macrophage inflammatory protein-1&bgr;, cervical interferon-&ggr;, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1. This model predicted outcome with 91% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 78% positive predictive value, and 94% negative predictive value, with a likelihood ratio of 5.6 and AUC of 0.91. An alternative, noninvasive model based on cervical length, cervical interferon-&ggr;, interleukin-6, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 predicted delivery within 7 days with 85% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 74% positive predictive value, and 90% negative predictive value, with a likelihood ratio of 4.7 and AUC of 0.91. CONCLUSION: A combination of proteins from amniotic fluid and cervical fluid or cervical length can help determine which women will deliver preterm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

[1]  D. Hougaard,et al.  Early second-trimester inflammatory markers and short cervical length and the risk of recurrent preterm birth. , 2007, Journal of reproductive immunology.

[2]  J. Scheller,et al.  The IL-6/sIL-6R complex as a novel target for therapeutic approaches , 2007, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[3]  R. Romero,et al.  The preterm parturition syndrome , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  C. Ananth,et al.  Epidemiology of preterm birth and its clinical subtypes , 2006, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  B. Jacobsson,et al.  Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in cervical fluid in a population of Swedish women in preterm labor: relationship to microbial invasion of the amniotic fluid, intra-amniotic inflammation, and preterm delivery. , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[6]  D. Hougaard,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of 25 inflammatory markers and neurotrophins in neonatal dried blood spots by immunoassay with xMAP technology. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 is increased in the amniotic fluid of women who deliver preterm in the presence or absence of intra-amniotic infection , 2005, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[8]  B. Jacobsson,et al.  Preterm birth in Sweden 1973–2001: Rate, subgroups, and effect of changing patterns in multiple births, maternal age, and smoking , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[9]  R. Goldenberg,et al.  Biochemical markers for the prediction of preterm birth. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  C. Parvin,et al.  Cervicovaginal interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-2 receptor as markers of preterm delivery. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  Bo Jacobsson,et al.  Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in cervical and amniotic fluid: relationship to microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intra-amniotic inflammation, and preterm delivery. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  B. Jacobsson,et al.  Microbial invasion and cytokine response in amniotic fluid in a Swedish population of women in preterm labor , 2003, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[13]  J. Steinke,et al.  2. Cytokines and chemokines. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[14]  N. Uldbjerg,et al.  Preterm delivery , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[15]  J. Cruse,et al.  10 - Cytokines and Chemokines , 2004 .

[16]  A. Fanaroff,et al.  Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990's. , 1999, Early human development.

[17]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Elevations of Amniotic Fluid Macrophage Inflammatory Protein‐1α Concentrations in Women During Term and Preterm Labor , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Regulation of Human Decidual Cell Macrophage Inflammatory Protein‐1α (MIP‐1α) Production by Inflammatory Cytokines , 1995 .

[19]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Regulation of human decidual cell macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha) production by inflammatory cytokines. , 1995, American journal of reproductive immunology.

[20]  M Galasso,et al.  Macrophage Inflammatory Protein‐1α in Term and Preterm Parturtition: Effect of Microbial Invasion of the Amniotic Cavity , 1994, American journal of reproductive immunology.

[21]  M C McCormick,et al.  The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.