Entry criteria as predictor of performance in an undergraduate nursing degree programme.

The Nursing Council of New Zealand recently reviewed the minimum standard entry criteria for acceptance into undergraduate nursing programmes. The Otago Polytechnic School of Nursing in Dunedin felt it timely to explore the relationship between academic performance and entry criteria. The School's entry criteria included a bioscience requirement, which varied from the Nursing Council criteria. This research explored the relationship between entry criteria and academic performance in the first and second year bioscience papers. The sample consisted of 619 academic records of the 1994-2002 graduates from the Degree Programme. The sample was divided into an under 20-age group (n=323) and a 20 and over group (n=296). This division related to a difference in the entry criteria for each of the groups. Chi-square and correlational analyses found a relationship between entry qualifications and students' academic performance in the two papers. The entry criteria had a stronger relationship with the students' performance in the first year bioscience paper than the second year paper. Performance in the first year was predicative of second year performance. Age was also found to be a useful predictor of grades. These findings support the School's Bioscience entry criteria and provide important information for admission committees.

[1]  G. McKee,et al.  Why is biological science difficult for first-year nursing students? , 2002, Nurse education today.

[2]  T Wilson A student selection method and predictors of success in a graduate nursing program. , 1999, The Journal of nursing education.

[3]  J. Larcombe,et al.  Who is best qualified to teach bioscience to nurses? , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[4]  E McClelland,et al.  A statewide study of academic variables affecting performance of baccalaureate nursing graduates on licensure examination. , 1992, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[5]  J Clancy,et al.  The biosciences and fitness for practice: a time for review? , 2001, British journal of nursing.

[6]  B. Houltram Entry age, entry mode and academic performance on a Project 2000 common foundation programme. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  S. Andrew,et al.  Self-efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  M. Nicol The teaching of genetics in New Zealand undergraduate nursing programmes. , 2002, Nurse education today.

[9]  S. Jordan Should nurses be studying bioscience? A discussion paper. , 1994, Nurse education today.