A Theory of Interactions: Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Algebraic Reasoning

Abstract The apparently weak properties of a purely qualitative algebra have led some to conclude that researchers must turn instead to extra-mathematical properties of physical systems. We propose instead that a more powerful qualitative algebra is needed, one that merges the algebras on signs and reals, along with symbolic techniques for manipulating this algebra. We have constructed a hybrid algebra, called SR1 which allows intermediate abstractions to be selected between traditional qualitative and quantitative algebras. SR1 and the symbolic algebra system Minima demonstrate substantial progress towards a theory of continuous interactions between quantities—one that allows just the interesting features of interactions to be represented, and that captures skills for composing and comparing interactions. This theory is sufficiently expressive to determine the behaviors that a variety of fluid regulation devices will achieve—not just what is impossible. It embodies in a simple manner many existing algebraic formalisms for describing and individually manipulating interactions, including confluences, inequalities, and monotonicity operators, as well as many of the individual inferences of qualitative arithmetic, composition of monotonicity, inequality algebra, transition analysis, qualitative resolution and traditional algebra.

[1]  Elisha Sacks,et al.  Qualitative Mathematical Reasoning , 1985, IJCAI.

[2]  Gerald Jay Sussman,et al.  Propagation of constraints applied to circuit synthesis , 1980 .

[3]  Joel Moses,et al.  Algebraic simplification: a guide for the perplexed , 1971, CACM.

[4]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Doing Time: Putting Qualitative Reasoning on Firmer Ground , 1986, AAAI.

[5]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Qualitative Simulation , 1986, Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  D. Pidhayny,et al.  The origins of feedback control , 1972 .

[7]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of MOS Circuits , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Thomas Dean,et al.  Temporal imagery: an approach to reasoning about time for planning and problem solving , 1986 .

[9]  Louise Travé-Massuyès,et al.  The Orders of Magnitude Models as Qualitative Algebras , 1989, IJCAI.

[10]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  MINIMA: A Symbolic Approach to Qualitative Algebraic Reasoning , 1988, AAAI.

[11]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Using Incomplete Quantitative Knowledge In Qualitative Reasoning , 1988, AAAI.

[12]  Gerald J. Sussman,et al.  Forward Reasoning and Dependency-Directed Backtracking in a System for Computer-Aided Circuit Analysis , 1976, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Kenneth Man-kam Yip,et al.  Understanding Complex Dynamics by Visual and Symbolic Reasoning , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Commonsense Reasoning about Causality: Deriving Behavior from Structure , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Kenneth D. Forbus Qualitative Process Theory , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Anil Nigam,et al.  Qualitative Physics Using Dimensional Analysis , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Olivier Raiman,et al.  Assembling a device , 1988, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[18]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Commonsense Arithmetic Reasoning , 1986, AAAI.

[19]  Benjamin J. Kaipers,et al.  Qualitative Simulation , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[20]  P. Struss Problems of interval-based qualitative reasoning , 1989 .

[21]  Tom Bylander The Qualitative Difference Resolution Rule , 1991, AAAI.

[22]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  A Qualitative Physics Based on Confluences , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Ramon E. Moore Methods and applications of interval analysis , 1979, SIAM studies in applied mathematics.

[24]  Olivier Raiman,et al.  Order of Magnitude Reasoning , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Comparative analysis and qualitative integral representations , 1993 .

[26]  Elisha Sacks,et al.  Hierarchical Reasoning about Inequalities , 1987, AAAI.

[27]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Interaction-Based Invention: Designing Novel Devices from First Principles , 1990, AAAI.