Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.

BACKGROUND Our objective was to determine the biomechanical primary stability of two different side plate fixation devices in an unstable intertrochanteric cadaver model: the Sliding Hip Screw with an additional derotation screw was compared with the Percutaneous Compression Plate. METHODS Eight pairs of human cadaver femurs were tested for comparison of the primary stability of the two implants in two modes: (a) cyclic loading up to 200 N, 400 N, 600 N, 800 N, and 1000 N, respectively. In vitro combined axial and bending loads were applied. Angular displacements of the proximal head fragment during loading were recorded in rotational, varus-valgus, and anterior-posterior directions. (b) The load to failure was determined. FINDINGS Specimens fixed with the Percutaneous Compression Plate showed higher displacements in the varus during loading up to 200 N (P=0.033), and 400 N (P=0.001), compared to the Sliding Hip Screw. A similar tendency was observed for higher loads. The Percutaneous Compression Plate allowed more external rotation of the proximal fragment only at loads up to 800 N (P=0.019). No statistical difference could be found for the slight migrations in the posterior direction. Load to failure also revealed no statistical difference between the two implants. INTERPRETATION The Percutaneous Compression Plate as a double-axis fixation device with a sliding capability allows higher displacements in the varus direction and also in external rotation at 800 N loading compared to the Sliding Hip Screw as a single-axis fixation device combined with an additional derotation screw. While both implants are successful used in clinical practice, this should be considered in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with inferior comminution in osteoporotic patients.

[1]  M. Parker,et al.  Sliding hip screw fixation of trochanteric hip fractures: outcome of 1024 procedures. , 2005, Injury.

[2]  D. Greenfield.  Risk factors for fracture. , 1998 .

[3]  M. E. Walsh,et al.  Biomechanical stability of four-part intertrochanteric fractures in cadaveric femurs fixed with a sliding screw-plate. , 1990, Injury.

[4]  E. Schopphoff,et al.  Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract , 2004, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[5]  C. C. Wu,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of location of lag screw of a dynamic hip screw in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  A. Miles,et al.  An experimental study of the failure modes of the Gamma Locking Nail and AO Dynamic Hip Screw under static loading: a cadaveric study. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  F. Kummer,et al.  The Medoff sliding plate and a standard sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a mechanical comparison in cadaver femurs. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  C. van der Werken,et al.  DHS osteosynthesis for stable pertrochanteric femur fractures with a two-hole side plate. , 2004, Injury.

[9]  R. Newman,et al.  The Gotfried percutaneous compression plate compared with the conventional classic hip screw for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  O. Michelsson,et al.  Femoral shaft medialisation and neck-shaft angle in unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[11]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Stability of femoral neck fracture. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of 29 hook-pinned fractures. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  A Horsman,et al.  Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  Y. Gotfried.  Percutaneous compression plating of intertrochanteric hip fractures. , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[14]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[15]  H. Janzing,et al.  The Gotfried PerCutaneous Compression Plate versus the Dynamic Hip Screw in the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures: minimal invasive treatment reduces operative time and postoperative pain. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  A. Simpson,et al.  Sliding hip screws: modes of failure. , 1989, Injury.

[17]  C. Roberts,et al.  Second generation intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a biomechanical study of fracture site motion. 2002. , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[18]  Jensen Js.  Trochanteric fractures. An epidemiological, clinical and biomechanical study. , 1981, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[19]  A. Malkani,et al.  The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a review of 93 cases. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  J. Puget,et al.  The percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients. , 2006, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[21]  A. V. van Vugt,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the percutaneous compression plate and sliding hip screw in intracapsular hip fractures: experimental assessment using synthetic and cadaver bones. , 2006, Injury.

[22]  J. Jenny,et al.  Type of screw does not influence holding power in the femoral head: a cadaver study with shearing test. , 1999, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  A L Yettram,et al.  Intramedullary femoral nails: one or two lag screws? A preliminary study. , 2000, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  A. Miles,et al.  Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut-out with the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw. , 1997, Injury.

[25]  R. Prokesch,et al.  Femoral neck fracture after removal of the standard gamma interlocking nail: a cadaveric study to determine factors influencing the biomechanical properties of the proximal femur. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  A. Tencer,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for the treatment of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[27]  K. Koval,et al.  Functional Outcomes and Mortality Vary among Different Types of Hip Fractures: A Function of Patient Characteristics , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  A. Rotem,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of the Percutaneous Compression Plating System for Hip Fractures , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[29]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Stability of femoral neck fractures. A postoperative roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[30]  M. V. Van Natta,et al.  Epidemiology of Hip Fractures Among the Elderly: Risk Factors for Fracture Type , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.