High-Speed Research: 1994 Sonic Boom Workshop. Configuration, Design, Analysis and Testing

A flight program using the SR-71 airplane to validate sonic boom technologies for High-Speed Commercial Transport (HSCT) operation and potentially for lowor softened-boom design configurations is described. This program employs a shaped signature modification to the SR-71 airplane which is designed to demonstrate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) design technology at a full-scale HSCT operating condition of Mach 1.8 at 48,000 feet altitude. Test plans call for measurements in the near-field, at intermediate propagation altitudes, and through the more turbulent boundary layer near the Earth surface. The shaped signature modification to the airplane is comprised of added cross-section areas on the underside of the airplane forward of the wing and engine nacelles. Because the flight demonstration does not approach maximum SR-71 altitude or Mach number, the airplane provides more than adequate performance and maneuver margins for safe operation of the modified airplane. Probe airplane measurements in the near-field will use fast response pressure sensors. Far-field and ground-based boom measurements will use high response rmcrophones or conventional sonic boom field recorders. Scope of the planned demonstration flights also includes ground level measurements during conditions which cause minimal signature distortion and conditions which cause high distortion of the signature. Outline • Introduction • Justification Flight test objectives Demonstration test approach Modified signature flight test plan Measurement requirements ° Discussion ° Summary

[1]  L. B. Jones Lower Bounds for Sonic Bangs , 1961, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[2]  Jack D. Leatherwood,et al.  Subjective loudness response to simulated sonic booms , 1992 .

[3]  C. L. Thomas Extrapolation of sonic boom pressure signatures by the waveform parameter method , 1972 .

[4]  Leonard M. Weinstein An optical technique for examining aircraft shock wave structures in flight , 1994 .

[5]  John M. Morgenstern Low sonic boom design and performance of a Mach 2.4/1.8 overland high speed civil transport , 1992 .

[6]  Brenda M. Sullivan,et al.  A New Simulator for Assessing Subjective Effects of Sonic Booms , 1991 .

[7]  Stephen A. Whitmore,et al.  Measurements of the Basic SR-71 Airplane Near-Field Signature , 1999 .

[8]  Raymond M. Hicks,et al.  Design and Computational/Experimental Analysis of Low Sonic Boom Configurations , 1999 .

[9]  David A. McCurdy,et al.  An in-home study of subjective response to simulated sonic booms , 1994 .

[10]  L. B. Jones Lower Bounds for Sonic Bangs in the Far Field , 1967 .

[11]  George T. Haglund Nacelle and forebody considerations in design for reduced sonic boom , 1992 .

[12]  R. J. Mack,et al.  A practical low-boom overpressure signature based on minimum sonic boom theory , 1992 .

[13]  R. Seebass,et al.  SONIC BOOM MINIMIZATION , 1998 .

[14]  Lixin Yao,et al.  Statistical and numerical study of the relation between weather and sonic boom characteristics , 1992 .

[15]  Robert A Lee,et al.  Air Force Boom Event Analyzer Recorder (BEAR): System Description , 1989 .

[16]  Peter G. Coen,et al.  A Performance Assessment of Eight Low-Boom High-Speed Civil Transport Concepts , 1999 .

[17]  Michael J. Siclari Sonic boom predictions using a modified Euler code , 1992 .

[18]  Raymond M. Hicks,et al.  Sonic boom prediction and minimization using computational fluid dynamics , 1992 .

[19]  Jeff Thomas,et al.  Residents' reactions to long-term sonic boom exposure: Preliminary results , 1994 .

[20]  H S Ribner,et al.  Subjective loudness and annoyance of filtered N-wave sonic booms. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R. Seebass,et al.  Minimum Sonic Boom Shock Strengths and Overpressures , 1969, Nature.

[22]  H. E. Kulsrud,et al.  SONIC BOOM PROPAGATION IN A STRATIFIED ATMOSPHERE, WITH COMPUTER PROGRAM. , 1969 .

[23]  William L. Willshire,et al.  Preliminary results from the White Sands Missile Range sonic boom propagation experiment , 1992 .

[24]  Victor W. Sparrow,et al.  Relaxation and turbulence effects on sonic boom signatures , 1992 .

[25]  Munir Metwally Economic benefits of supersonic overland operation , 1992 .

[26]  E. Kane,et al.  Analysis of sonic boom measurements near shock wave extremities for flight near Mach 1.0 and for airplane accelerations , 1974 .

[27]  Robert J. Mack Some considerations on the integration of engine nacelles into low-boom aircraft concepts , 1992 .

[28]  A. R. George,et al.  Lower Bounds for Sonic Booms in the Midfield , 1969 .

[29]  S. S. Stevens Perceived Level of Noise by Mark VII and Decibels (E) , 1972 .

[30]  Susan E. Cliff Computational/experimental analysis of three low sonic boom configurations with design modifications , 1992 .