11C-methionine-PET for differentiating recurrent brain tumor from radiation necrosis: radiomics approach with random forest classifier

Differentiating recurrent brain tumor from radiation necrosis is often difficult. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of 11C-methionine (MET)-PET radiomics for distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radiation necrosis, as compared with conventional tumor-to-normal cortex (T/N) ratio evaluation. We enrolled 41 patients with metastatic brain tumor or glioma treated using radiation therapy who underwent MET-PET. The area with a standardized uptake value > 1.3 times that of the normal brain cortex was contoured. Forty-two PET features were extracted and used in a random forest classifier and the diagnostic performance was evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation scheme. Gini index was measured to identify relevant PET parameters for classification. The reference standard was surgical histopathological analysis or more than 6 months of follow-up with MRI. Forty-four lesions were used for the analysis. Thirty-three and 11 lesions were confirmed as recurrent brain tumor and radiation necrosis, respectively. Radiomics and T/N ratio evaluation showed sensitivities of 90.1% and 60.6%, and specificities of 93.9% and 72.7% with areas under the curve of 0.98 and 0.73, respectively. Gray level co-occurrence matrix dissimilarity was the most pertinent feature for diagnosis. MET-PET radiomics yielded excellent outcome for differentiating recurrent brain tumor from radiation necrosis, which outperformed T/N ratio evaluation.

[1]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Radiomics in PET: principles and applications , 2014, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[2]  Iva Petkovska,et al.  MR Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Radiomics Analysis to Assess Treatment Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy. , 2018, Radiology.

[3]  T. Tamiya,et al.  Diagnostic Value of 11C-Methionine (MET) and 18F-Fluorothymidine (FLT) Positron Emission Tomography in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas; Differentiation from Treatment-Induced Tissue Necrosis , 2012, Cancers.

[4]  Perry W. Grigsby,et al.  Temporal analysis of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity characterized by textural features in cervical cancer , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future? , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Tadashi Nariai,et al.  Usefulness of L-[methyl-11C] methionine-positron emission tomography as a biological monitoring tool in the treatment of glioma. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  J. Bradley,et al.  Residual Post-Treatment FDG Avidity in Regional Lymph Nodes Impacts Local-Regional Control in Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiation for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 , 2014 .

[8]  Kei Yamada,et al.  Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014–2018 , 2018, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[9]  Anwen Shao,et al.  The performance of 11C-Methionine PET in the differential diagnosis of glioma recurrence , 2017, Oncotarget.

[10]  S. Hyun,et al.  Pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET-based radiomics predict survival in resected non-small cell lung cancer. , 2019, Clinical radiology.

[11]  Sang Mi Lee,et al.  Radiomics in Oncological PET/CT: Clinical Applications , 2018, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Soussan,et al.  Relationship between Tumor Heterogeneity Measured on FDG-PET/CT and Pathological Prognostic Factors in Invasive Breast Cancer , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  K. Drummond,et al.  Cerebral radiation necrosis , 2014, Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology.

[15]  P. Plowman Stereotactic radiosurgery. VIII. The classification of postradiation reactions. , 1999, British journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[17]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[18]  Jeffrey D Bradley,et al.  Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Textural Features in Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Martin Glas,et al.  Unsupervised consensus cluster analysis of [18F]-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography identified textural features for the diagnosis of pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma , 2016, Oncotarget.

[20]  H. Okazawa,et al.  18F-FDG PET radiomics approaches: comparing and clustering features in cervical cancer , 2017, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  A G Sorensen,et al.  Pseudoprogression and Pseudoresponse: Imaging Challenges in the Assessment of Posttreatment Glioma , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[22]  R. Ramponi,et al.  Clinical applications , 2007, Lasers in Medical Science.

[23]  M. Soussan,et al.  A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Irène Buvat,et al.  LIFEx: A Freeware for Radiomic Feature Calculation in Multimodality Imaging to Accelerate Advances in the Characterization of Tumor Heterogeneity. , 2018, Cancer research.

[25]  V. Goh,et al.  Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with PET Imaging Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  Anwen Shao,et al.  The performance of 11C-Methionine PET in the differential diagnosis of glioma recurrence. , 2017, Oncotarget.

[27]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Texture analysis on 18F-FDG PET/CT images to differentiate malignant and benign bone and soft-tissue lesions , 2014, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[29]  Andrew Menzies,et al.  The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer , 2010, Nature.

[30]  How Far Are We from Using Radiomics Assessment of Gliomas in Clinical Practice? , 2018, Radiology.

[31]  Frederick E. Petry,et al.  Principles and Applications , 1997 .

[32]  Steffen Löck,et al.  Image biomarker standardisation initiative - feature definitions , 2016, ArXiv.

[33]  H. Aerts,et al.  Applications and limitations of radiomics , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  T. Narayanan,et al.  11C-Methionine PET for Grading and Prognostication in Gliomas: A Comparison Study with 18F-FDG PET and Contrast Enhancement on MRI , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Volumetry of [11C]-methionine PET uptake and MRI contrast enhancement in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  Laurence E Court,et al.  The Incremental Value of Subjective and Quantitative Assessment of 18F-FDG PET for the Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Optimized Feature Extraction for Radiomics Analysis of 18F-FDG PET Imaging , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  N. Shah,et al.  Radiation injury vs. recurrent brain metastasis: combining textural feature radiomics analysis and standard parameters may increase 18F-FET PET accuracy without dynamic scans , 2017, European Radiology.

[39]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  An interindividual comparison of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)- and L-[methyl-11C]methionine (MET)-PET in patients with brain gliomas and metastases. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  Wanyu Liu,et al.  The method and efficacy of support vector machine classifiers based on texture features and multi-resolution histogram from (18)F-FDG PET-CT images for the evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[41]  T. Shiga,et al.  Prognostic value of volume-based measurements on 11C-methionine PET in glioma patients , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[42]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.