Single molecule fluorescence probes dynamics of barrier crossing

Kramers developed the theory on how chemical reaction rates are influenced by the viscosity of the medium. At the viscosity of water, the kinetics of unimolecular reactions are described by diffusion of a Brownian particle over a free-energy barrier separating reactants and products. For reactions in solution this famous theory extended Eyring’s transition state theory, and is widely applied in physics, chemistry and biology, including to reactions as complex as protein folding. Because the diffusion coefficient of Kramers’ theory is determined by the dynamics in the sparsely populated region of the barrier top, its properties have not been directly measured for any molecular system. Here we show that the Kramers diffusion coefficient and free-energy barrier can be characterized by measuring the temperature- and viscosity-dependence of the transition path time for protein folding. The transition path is the small fraction of an equilibrium trajectory for a single molecule when the free-energy barrier separating two states is actually crossed. Its duration, the transition path time, can now be determined from photon trajectories for single protein molecules undergoing folding/unfolding transitions. Our finding of a long transition path time with an unusually small solvent viscosity dependence suggests that internal friction as well as solvent friction determine the Kramers diffusion coefficient for α-helical proteins, as opposed to a breakdown of his theory, which occurs for many small-molecule reactions. It is noteworthy that the new and fundamental information concerning Kramers’ theory and the dynamics of barrier crossings obtained here come from experiments on a protein rather than a much simpler chemical or physical system.

[1]  Jan Kubelka,et al.  Estimating free-energy barrier heights for an ultrafast folding protein from calorimetric and kinetic data. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Experimental evidence for a frustrated energy landscape in a 3-helix bundle protein family , 2009, Nature.

[3]  W. Eaton,et al.  Measuring ultrafast protein folding rates from photon-by-photon analysis of single molecule fluorescence trajectories. , 2013, Chemical physics.

[4]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model , 1989 .

[5]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Ultrafast folding of α3D: A de novo designed three-helix bundle protein , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[7]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[8]  D. Makarov Interplay of non-Markov and internal friction effects in the barrier crossing kinetics of biopolymers: insights from an analytically solvable model. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  J. Dzubiella,et al.  Peptide chain dynamics in light and heavy water: zooming in on internal friction. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  M. Gruebele,et al.  A one-dimensional free energy surface does not account for two-probe folding kinetics of protein alpha(3)D. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  C. M. Jones,et al.  The role of solvent viscosity in the dynamics of protein conformational changes. , 1992, Science.

[12]  Martin Gruebele,et al.  Folding at the speed limit , 2003, Nature.

[13]  R. R. Cheng,et al.  Quantifying internal friction in unfolded and intrinsically disordered proteins with single-molecule spectroscopy , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  R. Stoller,et al.  Reaction Rate Theory , 2020, Comprehensive Nuclear Materials.

[15]  S. Hagen,et al.  Solvent viscosity and friction in protein folding dynamics. , 2010, Current protein & peptide science.

[16]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  The protein folding 'speed limit'. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Free energy surfaces from single-molecule force spectroscopy. , 2005, Accounts of chemical research.

[18]  William A Eaton,et al.  Measuring internal friction of an ultrafast-folding protein , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  G. Hummer,et al.  Reaction coordinates and rates from transition paths. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Szabó,et al.  Decoding the pattern of photon colors in single-molecule FRET. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  Andrew J. Viterbi,et al.  Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[22]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  P. Hänggi,et al.  Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers , 1990 .

[24]  G. Hummer From transition paths to transition states and rate coefficients. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  William A Eaton,et al.  Experimental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from single-molecule photon-by-photon trajectories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Microscopic Theory of Protein Folding Rates.II: Local Reaction Coordinates and Chain Dynamics , 2000, cond-mat/0008455.

[27]  Bojan Zagrovic,et al.  Solvent viscosity dependence of the folding rate of a small protein: Distributed computing study , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Effect of Viscosity on the Kinetics of α-Helix and β-Hairpin Formation , 2001 .

[29]  Mike Heilemann,et al.  A reducing and oxidizing system minimizes photobleaching and blinking of fluorescent dyes. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[30]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Consequences of localized frustration for the folding mechanism of the IM7 protein , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Viscosity Dependence of the Folding Rates of Proteins , 1997, cond-mat/9705309.

[32]  W. Eaton,et al.  Characterizing the unfolded states of proteins using single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and molecular simulations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  E. Henry,et al.  Chemical, physical, and theoretical kinetics of an ultrafast folding protein , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Kevin J. McHale,et al.  Single-Molecule Fluorescence Experiments Determine Protein Folding Transition Path Times , 2012, Science.

[35]  J. Onuchic,et al.  DIFFUSIVE DYNAMICS OF THE REACTION COORDINATE FOR PROTEIN FOLDING FUNNELS , 1996, cond-mat/9601091.

[36]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[37]  A. deMello,et al.  Quantitative 3D mapping of fluidic temperatures within microchannel networks using fluorescence lifetime imaging. , 2006, Analytical Chemistry.

[38]  William A Eaton,et al.  Extracting rate coefficients from single-molecule photon trajectories and FRET efficiency histograms for a fast-folding protein. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[39]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The experimental survey of protein-folding energy landscapes , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.