The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).

Users of bilateral cochlear implants and a cochlear implant combined with a contralateral hearing aid are sensitive to interaural time differences (ITDs). The way cochlear implant speech processors work and differences between modalities may result in interaural differences in shape of the temporal envelope presented to the binaural system. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on ITD sensitivity was investigated with normal-hearing listeners using a 4 kHz pure tone modulated with a periodic envelope with a trapezoid shape in each cycle. In one ear the onset segment of the trapezoid was transformed by a power function. No effect on the just noticeable difference in ITD was found with an interaural difference in envelope shape, but the ITD for a centered percept was significantly different across envelope shape conditions.

[1]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of intensity in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P. Heil.  Representation of Sound Onsets in the Auditory System , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  R. V. Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007 .

[5]  P. Heil,et al.  Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. First-spike timing. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects , 1981 .

[7]  P. Heil,et al.  Parallels between timing of onset responses of single neurons in cat and of evoked magnetic fields in human auditory cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Rasch,et al.  The perceptual onset of musical tones , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. V. van Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[13]  T Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Jan Wouters,et al.  APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope on sensitivity to interaural time delays. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.