Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance.

The increase in the litter size in past decades has caused reduction in the individual piglet birth weight. Therefore, nutritional strategies employed in the last third of gestation in order to improve the piglet birth weight have been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 2 different feeding levels (1.8 and 2.2 kg/d) in the last third of gestation on the piglet birth weight and the female reproductive performance. A total of 407 females were fed on a diet based on corn-soybean meal (3.25 Mcal ME per kg and 0.65% standardized ileal digestible lysine) from day 90 of gestation until farrowing. The females were weighed on day 90 and day 112 of gestation, and at weaning. Born alive and stillborn piglets were weighed within 12 h of birth. The lactation feed intake and the litter growth rate were measured in a randomly selected subsample of 53 sows from each treatment. The data were analyzed using the generalized linear mixed models, considering the females as the experimental unit. Parity, treatment, and their interaction were analyzed for all responses. The females fed on 2.2 kg/d of diet from day 90 to day 112 exhibited greater body weight gain compared to the females fed on 1.8 kg/d (P < 0.001). No evidence of the effects of feeding levels on the individual piglet birth weight and on the within-litter CV were observed, for both gilts and sows (P ≥ 0.90). Similarly, when the classes of the total born piglets were considered in the analysis (<15 and ≥15 for gilts; <16 and ≥16 for sows), no positive effects of increasing the feeding level were observed on the individual piglet birth weight and the within-litter CV (P ≥ 0.47). Also, no differences in the stillborn rate, mummified-fetus rate, and percentage of piglets weighing less than 1,000 g at birth were observed between the treatments (P ≥ 0.28). The females fed on 1.8 kg/d of diet exhibited greater feed intake during lactation, compared to the females fed on 2.2 kg/d (P < 0.05). Weaning weight, weaning-to-estrus interval, subsequent litter size, and culling rate were not affected by the dietary levels (P ≥ 0.23). In conclusion, increasing the feed intake from day 90 of gestation until farrowing increased the body weight gain in sow, demonstrated no effect on the piglet birth weight, and reduced the lactation feed intake. Furthermore, there was no evidence of the effects of the treatments on the litter growth rate or on the subsequent female reproductive performance.

[1]  M. Père,et al.  Nutrient uptake of the uterus during the last third of pregnancy in sows: Effects of litter size, gestation stage and maternal glycemia. , 2018, Animal reproduction science.

[2]  Y. Koketsu,et al.  Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds , 2017, Porcine health management.

[3]  J. DeRouchey,et al.  Fact sheet -- Impact of increased feed intake during late gestation on reproductive performance of gilts and sows , 2016 .

[4]  N. Bello,et al.  Effects of amino acids and energy intake during late gestation of high-performing gilts and sows on litter and reproductive performance under commercial conditions. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[5]  M. Bernardi,et al.  Low birth weight affects lifetime productive performance and longevity of female swine , 2016 .

[6]  P. Theil,et al.  Neonatal piglet survival: impact of sow nutrition around parturition on fetal glycogen deposition and production and composition of colostrum and transient milk. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[7]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Intra-uterine growth retardation affects birthweight and postnatal development in pigs, impairing muscle accretion, duodenal mucosa morphology and carcass traits. , 2013, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[8]  G. Foxcroft Reproduction in farm animals in an era of rapid genetic change: will genetic change outpace our knowledge of physiology? , 2012, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[9]  J. Donzele,et al.  Effects of sow nutrition during gestation on within-litter birth weight variation: a review. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[10]  H. Poulsen,et al.  Lactation, milk and suckling , 2012 .

[11]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Restricted feed intake in lactating primiparous sows. I. Effects on sow metabolic state and subsequent reproductive performance. , 2011, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[12]  J. Jacela,et al.  Effects of lactation feed intake and creep feeding on sow and piglet performance. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[13]  M. Bernardi,et al.  Body reserve mobilization during lactation in first parity sows and its effect on second litter size , 2010 .

[14]  J. Fix,et al.  Effect of piglet birth weight on body weight, growth, backfat, and longissimus muscle area of commercial market swine , 2010 .

[15]  J. DeRouchey,et al.  Effects of increasing feeding level during late gestation on sow and litter performance , 2009 .

[16]  J. Jacela,et al.  Effects of lactation feed intake and creep feeding on sow and piglet performance , 2007 .

[17]  M. Père,et al.  Insulin sensitivity during pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning in primiparous gilts. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[18]  C. Putman,et al.  The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[19]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Embryonic and fetal development in a commercial dam-line genotype. , 2005, Animal reproduction science.

[20]  F. Ji,et al.  Changes in weight and composition in various tissues of pregnant gilts and their nutritional implications. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[21]  R. Main,et al.  Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[22]  F. Ji,et al.  Growth and compositional changes of fetal tissues in pigs. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[23]  C. Dewey,et al.  Neonatal-piglet weight variation and its relation to pre-weaning mortality and weight gain on commercial farms. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[24]  Nathalie Quiniou,et al.  Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance , 2002 .

[25]  H. Miller,et al.  Increasing food intake in late gestation improved sow condition throughout lactation but did not affect piglet viability or growth rate , 2000 .

[26]  B. Kemp,et al.  Sow factors affecting voluntary feed intake during lactation , 2000 .

[27]  M. Hathaway,et al.  Effect of protein intake during gestation and lactation on the lactational performance of primiparous sows. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[28]  B. Mullan,et al.  Body composition at farrowing and nutrition during lactation affect the performance of primiparous sows: I. Voluntary feed intake, weight loss, and plasma metabolites. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[29]  G D Dial,et al.  Feed intake pattern during lactation and subsequent reproductive performance of sows. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[30]  A. Lewis,et al.  Postpartum hypophagia in primiparous sows: II. Effects of feeding level during gestation and exogenous insulin on lactation feed intake, glucose tolerance, and epinephrine-stimulated release of nonesterified fatty acids and glucose. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[31]  G. Cromwell,et al.  Effects of additional feed during late gestation on reproductive performance of sows: a cooperative study. , 1989, Journal of animal science.

[32]  R. King,et al.  The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows 3. The response to graded increases in food intake during lactation , 1986 .

[33]  Board on Agriculture,et al.  Nutrient requirements of swine , 1964 .