Activation of articulatory information in speech perception

Emerging neurophysiologic evidence indicates that motor systems are activated during the perception of speech, but whether this activity reflects basic processes underlying speech perception remains a matter of considerable debate. Our contribution to this debate is to report direct behavioral evidence that specific articulatory commands are activated automatically and involuntarily during speech perception. We used electropalatography to measure whether motor information activated from spoken distractors would yield specific distortions on the articulation of printed target syllables. Participants produced target syllables beginning with /k/ or /s/ while listening to the same syllables or to incongruent rhyming syllables beginning with /t/. Tongue–palate contact for target productions was measured during the articulatory closure of /k/ and during the frication of /s/. Results revealed “traces” of the incongruent distractors on target productions, with the incongruent /t/-initial distractors inducing greater alveolar contact in the articulation of /k/ and /s/ than the congruent distractors. Two further experiments established that (i) the nature of this interference effect is dependent specifically on the articulatory properties of the spoken distractors; and (ii) this interference effect is unique to spoken distractors and does not arise when distractors are presented in printed form. Results are discussed in terms of a broader emerging framework concerning the relationship between perception and action, whereby the perception of action entails activation of the motor system.

[1]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Exploring the Articulatory Loop , 1984 .

[2]  L. Fadiga,et al.  The Motor Somatotopy of Speech Perception , 2009, Current Biology.

[3]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  The Neuroscience of Language: On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order , 2003 .

[5]  P. Dixon,et al.  Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  T. Paus,et al.  Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Marianne Pouplier,et al.  Tongue Kinematics during Utterances Elicited with the SLIP Technique , 2007, Language and speech.

[10]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters , 2006 .

[11]  S. Scott,et al.  The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Exploring the processing continuum of single-word comprehension in aphasia. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[16]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  Mapping from Sound to Meaning: Reduced Lexical Activation in Broca's Aphasics , 2001, Brain and Language.

[17]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Response to Wilson: What does motor cortex contribute to speech perception? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  U. Castiello,et al.  The Human Premotor Cortex Is 'Mirror' Only for Biological Actions , 2004, Current Biology.

[19]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  A little more conversation, a little less action — candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  M Coltheart,et al.  Reading aloud begins when the computation of phonology is complete. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  The Essential Role of Premotor Cortex in Speech Perception , 2007, Current Biology.

[22]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[23]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[25]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Liberman,et al.  On the relation of speech to language , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[28]  U. Castiello Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[31]  M. Snowling,et al.  The Nonword Reading Deficit in Developmental Dyslexia: A Review. , 1992 .

[32]  K. Rastle,et al.  Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  A. Alwan,et al.  Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part I. The laterals. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.