Topology Optimization with Wachspress and Voronoi Finite Elements

1. Abstract Traditionally, standard Lagrangian-type finite elements, such as linear quads and triangles, have been the elements of choice in the field of topology optimization. In general, finite element meshes with these elements exhibit the well-known checkerboard pathology in the iterative solution of topology optimization problems. Voronoi and Wachspress-type finite elements are less susceptible to such anomalies. Moreover, these elements provide more flexibility in mesh generation and are suitable for applications involving significant changes in the topology of the material domain. In particular, hexagonal Wachspress meshes include two-node connections (i.e. two elements are either not connected or connected by two nodes), and three edge-based symmetry lines per element. In contrast, quads can display one-node connections, which favor checkerboard configurations; and only have two edge-based symmetry lines. Thus checkerboard-free solutions are obtained without any further restrictions on the local variation of material density or filtering techniques (e.g. filter of sensitivities). We explore general Voronoi-type elements and present their implementation using a couple of approaches for topology optimization: e.g. element-based, and minimum length-scale control through projection functions. Examples are presented that demonstrate the advantages of the proposed elements in achieving checkerboard-free solutions and avoiding spurious fine-scale patterns from the design optimization process. Potential extensions and impact of this work will also be discussed. 2.

[1]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Checkerboard patterns in layout optimization , 1995 .

[2]  J. Petersson,et al.  Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima , 1998 .

[3]  Dongwoo Sheen,et al.  Checkerboard‐free topology optimization using non‐conforming finite elements , 2003 .

[4]  C. S. Jog,et al.  Stability of finite element models for distributed-parameter optimization and topology design , 1996 .

[5]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  Honeycomb Wachspress finite elements for structural topology optimization , 2009 .

[6]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  On CAD-integrated structural topology and design optimization , 1991 .

[7]  James K. Guest,et al.  Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions , 2004 .

[8]  S. Rahmatalla,et al.  A Q4/Q4 continuum structural topology optimization implementation , 2004 .

[9]  N. Sukumar,et al.  Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Recent Advances in the Construction of Polygonal Finite Element Interpolants , 2022 .

[10]  M. Bendsøe Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[11]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[12]  Thomas A. Poulsen A simple scheme to prevent checkerboard patterns and one-node connected hinges in topology optimization , 2002 .

[13]  K. Matsui,et al.  Continuous approximation of material distribution for topology optimization , 2004 .

[14]  N. Sukumar,et al.  Conforming polygonal finite elements , 2004 .