Multiple Measures of Alyawarra Kinship

A field experiment conducted in Central Australia in 1971–1972 explored differences between what Aborigines actually did andw hat they said they did when anthropologists interviewed them. Fieldwork entailed observing behavior and recording it in numerically coded forms; analysis entails extracting patterns computationally that would not appear in traditional ethnographic data. This article focuses on discrepancies between expected and observed with regard to descent, marriage, and kinship. First, it examines field methods and the dataset, then reviews analytical methods used to interpret the data. The alternative analytical methods serve to test “competing hypotheses” about the nature and operation of Alyawarra descent, marriage, and kinship. The cumulative result of using these diverse methods has been increasingly complex and subtle understandings of previously unknown aspects of Central Australian social organization. The data continue to repay increasingly sophisticated analyses thirty years after they were recorded, thus attesting to the success of the field experiment.

[1]  A. C. Haddon The Arunta: a Study of a Stone Age People , 1928, Nature.

[2]  U. McConnel SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE TRIBES OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA, NORTH QUEENSLAND , 1939 .

[3]  JUNIOR MARRIAGE SYSTEMS: COMPARATIVE SURVEY1 , 1950 .

[4]  POPULATION PROPERTIES OF PHYSICAL GROUPS AMONG THE ALYAWARA TRIBE OF CENTRAL AUSTRALIA , 1975 .

[5]  L. Binford,et al.  Nunamiut Demographic History. in Demagraphic Anthropology Quantitative Anthro-Approaches. Edited By Ezra B.W. Zubrow. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM , 1976 .

[6]  Du Kak Si : the structural implications of matrilateral cross cousin marriage : the Tlingit case , 1978 .

[7]  W. Denham Introduction to the Alyawara Ethnographic Data Base , 1979 .

[8]  W. Denham,et al.  Aranda and Alyawara kinship: a quantitative argument for a double helix model , 1979 .

[9]  G. Lathrop,et al.  Genealogical Structures and Consanguineous Marriage [and Comments and Replies] , 1981, Current Anthropology.

[10]  J. Atkins,et al.  More Complex Formulae of Generalized Exchange [and Comments and Replies] , 1981, Current Anthropology.

[11]  Harold W. Scheffler,et al.  theory and method in social anthropology: on the structures of systems of kin classification , 1982 .

[12]  Franklin E. Tjon Sie Fat age metrics and twisted cylinders: predictions from a structural model , 1983 .

[13]  D. Bell Daughters Of The Dreaming , 1983 .

[14]  K. Reitz,et al.  Graph and Semigroup Homomorphisms on Networks of Relations , 1983 .

[15]  E. Aronson,et al.  Theory and method , 1985 .

[16]  L. Freeman Research Methods in Social Network Analysis , 1991 .

[17]  Douglas R. White,et al.  Representing and Computing Kinship: A New Approach , 1992, Current Anthropology.

[18]  Douglas R. White,et al.  Kinship networks and discrete structure theory: Applications and implications , 1996 .

[19]  D. R. White Structural endogamy and the network graphe de parenté , 1997 .

[20]  White Structural Endogamy and the graph de parenté , 1997 .

[21]  Douglas R. White,et al.  Class, property, and structural endogamy: Visualizing networked histories , 1997 .

[22]  D. R. White,et al.  Kinship, Property Transmission, and Stratification in Rural Java , 1998 .

[23]  Kinship, Property Transmission, and Stratification in Javanese Villages , 1998 .

[24]  D. R. White,et al.  Taking Sides: Marriage networks and Dravidian Kinship in Lowland South America , 1998 .

[25]  Book review of "Arguments about Aborigines: Australia and the evolution of social anthropology" by L.R. Hiatt, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK , 1998 .

[26]  M. Godelier,et al.  Transformations of kinship , 1998 .

[27]  Raúl E. Valdés-Pérez,et al.  Automatic componential analysis of kinship semantics with a proposed structural solution to the problem of multiple models , 1998 .

[28]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[29]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Generalized blockmodeling , 2005, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[30]  Dwight W. Read,et al.  Formal analysis of kinship terminologies and its relationship to what constitutes kinship , 2000 .

[31]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[32]  Michael Houseman TakingSides Taking Sides : From Coherent Practice to Macro Organization , 2002 .

[33]  D. R. White,et al.  Taking Sides: From Coherent Practice in Cohesive Neighborhoods to Macro Organization , 2002 .

[34]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Generalized blockmodeling of two-mode network data , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[35]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Generalized Blockmodeling: Titles in the series , 2004 .

[36]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .