From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? the Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation * 1 Data 1.1 the Dataset 2 Experimental Design and Sorting Methodology

We take cohorts of entering freshmen at the United States Air Force Academy and assign half to peer groups designed to maximize the academic performance of the lowest ability students. Our assignment algorithm uses nonlinear peer effects estimates from the historical pre-treatment data, in which students were randomly assigned to peer groups. We find a negative and significant treatment effect for the students we intended to help. We provide evidence that within our �optimally� designed peer groups, students avoided the peers with whom we intended them to interact and instead formed more homogeneous subgroups. These results illustrate how policies that manipulate peer groups for a desired social outcome can be confounded by changes in the endogenous patterns of social interactions within the group.

[1]  R. Bénabou Heterogeneity, Stratification, and Growth , 1993 .

[2]  J. E. West,et al.  Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors , 2008, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  David V. Pritchett Econometric policy evaluation: A critique , 1976 .

[4]  Guido W. Imbens,et al.  Complementarity and Aggregate Implications of Assortative Matching: A Nonparametric Analysis , 2009 .

[5]  Steven L. Puller,et al.  The Old Boy (and Girl) Network: Social Network Formation on University Campuses , 2008 .

[6]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[7]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Theory, General Equilibrium and Political Economy in Development Economics , 2010 .

[8]  David S. Lyle Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  Debopam Bhattacharya,et al.  Inferring Optimal Peer Assignment From Experimental Data , 2009 .

[10]  David S. Lyle The Effects of Peer Group Heterogeneity on the Production of Human Capital at West Point , 2009 .

[11]  D. Zimmerman Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[12]  J. E. West,et al.  Peer Effects in Academic Cheating , 2005, The Journal of Human Resources.

[13]  Roland Bénabou,et al.  Heterogeneity, Stratification, and Growth: Macroeconomic Implications of Community Structure and School Finance , 1996 .

[14]  J. E. West,et al.  Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement , 2009 .

[15]  Gigi Foster It's not your peers, and it's not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism , 2006 .

[16]  Todd R. Stinebrickner,et al.  What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds , 2006 .

[17]  David Marmaros,et al.  How Do Friendships Form? , 2005 .

[18]  Denison Gatehouse,et al.  PEER EFFECTS IN ACADEMIC OUTCOMES: Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 1999 .