Universal primers and PCR of gut contents to study marine invertebrate diets

Determining the diets of marine invertebrates by gut content analysis is problematic. Many consumed organisms become unrecognizable once partly digested, while those with hard remains (e.g. diatom skeletons) may bias the analysis. Here, we adapt DNA‐based methods similar to those used for microbial diversity surveys as a novel approach to study the diets of macrophagous (the deep‐sea amphipods Scopelocheirus schellenbergi and Eurythenes gryllus) and microphagous (the bivalve Lucinoma aequizonata) feeders in the deep sea. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in conjunction with ‘universal’ primers amplified portions of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene for animals ingested by S. schellenbergi and E. gryllus and the 18S rRNA gene for lesser eukaryotes ingested by L. aequizonata. Amplified sequences were combined with sequences from GenBank to construct phylogenetic trees of ingested organisms. Our analyses indicate that S. schellenbergi, E. gryllus and L. aequizonata diets are considerably more diverse than previously thought, casting new light on the foraging strategies of these species. Finally, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this technique and its potential applicability to diet analyses of other invertebrates.

[1]  R. Hessler,et al.  Distribution and behavior of scavenging amphipods from the central North Pacific , 1983 .

[2]  B. Sainte‐Marie Foraging of Scavenging Deep-Sea Lysianassoid Amphipods , 1992 .

[3]  M. Kaiser,et al.  OPINION Obligate marine scavengers: do they exist? , 1999 .

[4]  J. Hemingway,et al.  Can multiple‐copy sequences of prey DNA be detected amongst the gut contents of invertebrate predators? , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[5]  S. Dufour,et al.  Anatomical and experimental evidence for particulate feeding in Lucinoma aequizonata and Parvilucina tenuisculpta (Bivalvia: Lucinidae) from the Santa Barbara Basin , 2004 .

[6]  D. Maddison,et al.  MacClade 4: analysis of phy-logeny and character evolution , 2003 .

[7]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  R. Wachter,et al.  Oceanic 18S rDNA sequences from picoplankton reveal unsuspected eukaryotic diversity , 2001, Nature.

[9]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .

[10]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Identification of consumed stone flounder, Kareius bicoloratus (Basilewsky), from the stomach contents of sand shrimp, Crangon affinis (De Haan) using mitochondrial DNA analysis , 1997 .

[11]  M. Sogin,et al.  The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. , 1988, Gene.

[12]  N. G. Elliott,et al.  A DNA‐based method for identification of krill species and its application to analysing the diet of marine vertebrate predators , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[13]  T. Brey,et al.  Deep-sea food falls: first observation of a natural event in the Arctic Ocean , 2001, Polar Biology.

[14]  Thomas Huber,et al.  Chimeric 16S rDNA sequences of diverse origin are accumulating in the public databases. , 2003, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[15]  D. -. Zhang,et al.  Nuclear integrations: challenges for mitochondrial DNA markers. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  T. Kocher,et al.  Geographic and bathymetric patterns of mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence divergence among deep-sea amphipods, Eurythenes gryllus , 1996 .

[17]  B. Deagle,et al.  Group‐specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA‐based analysis of species diversity and identity in dietary samples , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[18]  Bryan R. Burnett,et al.  Scavenging amphipods from the floor of the Philippine trench , 1978 .

[19]  B. Morton,et al.  Marine carrion and scavengers , 1994 .

[20]  T. Kocher,et al.  DNA-based identification of larval cod in stomach contents of predatory fishes , 2002 .

[21]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships of some species of the genus Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda) deduced from mitochondrial DNA sequences. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[22]  R. Wayne,et al.  Facts from feces revisited. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  J. Harwood,et al.  Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[24]  G. A. Phillips,et al.  Rapid digestion and assimilation of bait by the deep-sea amphipod Eurythenes gryllus , 1995 .

[25]  W. Symondson Molecular identification of prey in predator diets , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[26]  K. Smith,et al.  Vertical distribution of the necrophagous amphipod, Eurythenes gryllus, in the North Pacific: spatial and temporal variation , 1984 .

[27]  N. Pace,et al.  Novel kingdom-level eukaryotic diversity in anoxic environments , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[29]  K. Smith,et al.  Scavenging deep-sea amphipods: Effects of food odor on oxygen consumption and a proposed metabolic strategy , 1982 .

[30]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.