The Rockefeller Team Science Leadership training program: Curriculum, standardized assessment of competencies, and impact of returning assessments

Abstract The ability to effectively lead an interdisciplinary translational team is a crucial component of team science success. Most KL2 Clinical Scholars have been members of scientific teams, but few have been team science leaders. There is a dearth of literature and outcome measures of effective Team Science Leadership in clinical and translational research. We focused our curriculum to emphasize Team Science Leadership, developed a list of Team Science Leadership competencies for translational investigators using a modified Delphi method, and incorporated the competencies into a quantitative evaluation survey. The survey is completed on entry and annually thereafter by the Scholar; the Scholar’s primary mentor and senior staff who educate and interact with the Scholar rate the Scholar at the end of each year. The program leaders and mentor review the results with each Scholar. The survey scales had high internal consistency and good factor structure. Overall ratings by mentors and senior staff were generally high, but ratings by Scholars tended to be lower, offering opportunities for discussion and career planning. Scholars rated the process favorably. A Team Science Leadership curriculum and periodic survey of attained competencies can inform individual career development and guide team science curriculum development.

[1]  Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano,et al.  Individual and team competencies in translational teams , 2020, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science.

[2]  J. Tobin,et al.  The Rockefeller University Clinical Scholars (KL2) program 2006–2016 , 2017, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science.

[3]  M. Murtaugh,et al.  Team science and the physician–scientist in the age of grand health challenges , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  B. Coller,et al.  Informed consent for next-generation nucleotide sequencing studies: Aiding communication between participants and investigators , 2017, Journal of clinical and translational science.

[5]  J. Tobin,et al.  Helping Basic Scientists Engage With Community Partners to Enrich and Accelerate Translational Research , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology , 2016, BMJ Open.

[7]  W. Giannobile Clinical and Translational Research , 2015, Journal of dental research.

[8]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  COMMITTEE ON THE SCIENCE OF TEAM SCIENCE , 2015 .

[9]  B. Coller,et al.  A Data‐Rich Recruitment Core to Support Translational Clinical Research , 2015, Clinical and translational science.

[10]  B. Coller,et al.  The Research Hospitalist: Protocol Enabler and Protector of Participant Safety , 2015, Clinical and Translational Science.

[11]  B. Coller,et al.  The Rockefeller University Graduate Tracking Survey System , 2014, Clinical and Translational Science.

[12]  B. Coller,et al.  The Rockefeller University Navigation Program: A Structured Multidisciplinary Protocol Development and Educational Program to Advance Translational Research , 2014, Clinical and translational science.

[13]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Norman Crolee Dalkey,et al.  An experimental study of group opinion , 1969 .