Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study

Organizational routines-multi-actor, interlocking, reciprocally-triggered sequences of actions-are a major source of the reliability and speed of organizational performance. Without routines, organizations would lose efficiency as structures for collective action. But these frequently repeated action sequences can also occasionally give rise to serious suboptimality, hampering performance when they are automatically transferred onto inappropriate situations. While the knowledgeable design and redesign of routines presents a likely lever for those wishing to enhance organizational performance, the lever remains difficult to grasp because routines are hard to observe, analyze, and describe. This paper argues that new work in psychology on "procedural" memory may help explain how routines arise, stabilize and change. Procedural memory has close links to notions of individual skill and habit. It is memory for how things are done that is relatively automatic and inarticulate, and it encompasses both cognitive and motor activities. We report an experiment in which paired subjects developed interlocked task performance patterns that display the chief characteristics of organizational routines. We show evidence from their behavior supporting the claim that individuals store their components of organizational routines in procedural memory. If routines are stored as distributed procedural memories, this may be the source of distinctive properties reported by observers of organizational routines. The paper concludes with implications for both research and practice.

[1]  R. Drazin,et al.  Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organizing , 1992 .

[2]  Michael X Cohen.  Individual Learning and Organizational Routine: Emerging Connections , 1991 .

[3]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[4]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[5]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[6]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[7]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[8]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[9]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[10]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  Of Mice and Managers@@@In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1992 .

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[12]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[13]  L. Squire.  Memory and Brain , 1987 .

[14]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[15]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  Eyewitness Identification: Retrospective Self-Awareness and the Accuracy-Confidence Correlation , 1985 .

[16]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. , 1985 .

[17]  A P Shimamura,et al.  Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Mathematics in the streets and in schools , 1985 .

[19]  P. Nystrom,et al.  To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn , 1984 .

[20]  G Mandler,et al.  The information that amnesic patients do not forget. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design , 1983, TOIS.

[22]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[23]  W. Deming.  Quality, productivity, and competitive position , 1982 .

[24]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[25]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[26]  Michael Inbar,et al.  Routine decision-making : the future of bureaucracy , 1979 .

[27]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[28]  Graham Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[29]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Fate of Arbitrary Traditions in a Laboratory Microculture. , 1971 .

[30]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[31]  B. Barber,et al.  Men, Machines, and Modern Times. , 1967 .

[32]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[33]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[34]  E. O. Stene.  An Approach to a Science of Administration , 1940, American Political Science Review.

[35]  M. Bunch,et al.  The amount of transfer in rational learning as a function of time. , 1936 .