Selective Attention Increases Choice Certainty in Human Decision Making

Choice certainty is a probabilistic estimate of past performance and expected outcome. In perceptual decisions the degree of confidence correlates closely with choice accuracy and reaction times, suggesting an intimate relationship to objective performance. Here we show that spatial and feature-based attention increase human subjects' certainty more than accuracy in visual motion discrimination tasks. Our findings demonstrate for the first time a dissociation of choice accuracy and certainty with a significantly stronger influence of voluntary top-down attention on subjective performance measures than on objective performance. These results reveal a so far unknown mechanism of the selection process implemented by attention and suggest a unique biological valence of choice certainty beyond a faithful reflection of the decision process.

[1]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  Teri A. Crosby,et al.  How to Detect and Handle Outliers , 1993 .

[3]  J. Gottlieb.  From Thought to Action: The Parietal Cortex as a Bridge between Perception, Action, and Cognition , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  J. Jastrow,et al.  On small differences in sensation , 1884 .

[5]  A. Cowey,et al.  Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[7]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[8]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Mustering motivation to enact decisions: how decision process characteristics influence goal realization , 2002 .

[10]  S. Kakade,et al.  Learning and selective attention , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Behavioral Performance and Neuronal Responses in Middle Temporal and Ventral Intraparietal Areas of Macaque Monkey , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  V. Henmon,et al.  The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. , 1911 .

[13]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Selective attention increases the dependency of cortical responses on visual motion coherence in man. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Processing of Motion in Macaque Middle Temporal and Medial Superior Temporal Visual Cortical Areas , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Hatim A. Zariwala,et al.  Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence , 2008, Nature.

[16]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention , 2003, Science.

[17]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  A. Sereno,et al.  Attention and memory-related responses of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during spatial and shape-delayed match-to-sample tasks. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[21]  Wolfgang Sanz,et al.  Laser-optical investigation of stator-rotor interaction in a transonic turbine , 2006, J. Vis..

[22]  C. Koch,et al.  Betting the house on consciousness , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  A. Yuille,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? , 2022 .

[25]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[26]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Cz..  Handbuch der physiologischen Optik , 1896 .

[28]  M. Ernst,et al.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[29]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex , 2009, Science.

[30]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Learning Priors for Bayesian Computations in the Nervous System , 2010, PloS one.

[31]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[33]  D. Burr,et al.  Visual Clutter Causes High-Magnitude Errors , 2006, PLoS biology.

[34]  Christopher R Fetsch,et al.  Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters the appearance of motion coherence , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Opposite dependencies on visual motion coherence in human area MT+ and early visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  R. Zemel,et al.  Statistical models and sensory attention , 1999 .