Choosing MUSE: Validation of a Low-Cost, Portable EEG System for ERP Research

In recent years there has been an increase in the number of portable low-cost electroencephalographic (EEG) systems available to researchers. However, to date the validation of the use of low-cost EEG systems has focused on continuous recording of EEG data and/or the replication of large system EEG setups reliant on event-markers to afford examination of event-related brain potentials (ERP). Here, we demonstrate that it is possible to conduct ERP research without being reliant on event markers using a portable MUSE EEG system and a single computer. Specifically, we report the results of two experiments using data collected with the MUSE EEG system—one using the well-known visual oddball paradigm and the other using a standard reward-learning task. Our results demonstrate that we could observe and quantify the N200 and P300 ERP components in the visual oddball task and the reward positivity (the mirror opposite component to the feedback-related negativity) in the reward-learning task. Specifically, single sample t-tests of component existence (all p's < 0.05), computation of Bayesian credible intervals, and 95% confidence intervals all statistically verified the existence of the N200, P300, and reward positivity in all analyses. We provide with this research paper an open source website with all the instructions, methods, and software to replicate our findings and to provide researchers with an easy way to use the MUSE EEG system for ERP research. Importantly, our work highlights that with a single computer and a portable EEG system such as the MUSE one can conduct ERP research with ease thus greatly extending the possible use of the ERP methodology to a variety of novel contexts.

[1]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Principles of signal acquisition and analysis , 1986 .

[3]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[4]  M. Kutas,et al.  Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[5]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Estimating the spatial Nyquist of the human EEG , 1998 .

[7]  Rajeev Shorey,et al.  The Bluetooth technology: merits and limitations , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8488).

[8]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Jennifer Bray,et al.  Bluetooth 1.1: Connect Without Cables, Second Edition , 2001 .

[10]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[11]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  John A. Cadwell,et al.  Chapter 2 – Electrophysiologic Equipment and Electrical Safety , 2005 .

[13]  S. Debener,et al.  How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk? , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Eduardo Casilari-Pérez,et al.  Analytical and empirical evaluation of the impact of Gaussian noise on the modulations employed by Bluetooth Enhanced Data Rates , 2012, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.

[15]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  Performance of the Emotiv Epoc headset for P300-based applications , 2013, Biomedical engineering online.

[16]  G. McArthur,et al.  Validation of the Emotiv EPOC® EEG gaming system for measuring research quality auditory ERPs , 2013, PeerJ.

[17]  Rosa H. M. Chan,et al.  Spectral modulation of frontal EEG during motor skill acquisition: a mobile EEG study. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Imaging natural cognition in action. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  S. Debener,et al.  Towards a truly mobile auditory brain-computer interface: exploring the P300 to take away. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  Sven Hoffmann,et al.  Towards the measurement of event-related EEG activity in real-life working environments. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  Greg H. Proudfit The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[22]  G. McArthur,et al.  Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children , 2015, PeerJ.

[23]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[24]  Rytis Maskeliunas,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 Consumer-grade Eeg Devices: Are They Usable for Control Tasks? , 2022 .

[25]  Kyle E Mathewson,et al.  Transitioning EEG experiments away from the laboratory using a Raspberry Pi 2 , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.