Cognitive neuroactivation using SPECT and the Stroop Colored Word Test in patients with diffuse brain injury.

Psychomotor slowing in patients with diffuse brain injury frequently underlies impaired cognitive performance on neuropsychological tests, for example, the Stroop Colored Word test. The aim of the present study was to determine the neural basis associated with performance on the Stroop interference subtask in patients with diffuse brain injury. We hypothesized that patients would be slower than healthy controls, and that this would be associated with brain activations other than those seen in healthy subjects. Brain perfusion, using a split-dose activation paradigm with single photon emission tomography (SPECT) and the Stroop test, was assessed in 9 patients with diffuse brain injury. The Stroop interference score was calculated as a behavioral parameter, and functional imaging data were analyzed with statistical parametrical mapping (SPM99) to determine significant voxel-wise differences of activation between the control and the activation condition. Patients were impaired on the interference subtask of the Stroop test. Comparison of the SPECT data obtained during the activation condition with those obtained during the control condition by means of SPM showed significant activations in the left inferior parietal lobe, the right anterior cingulate extending into the right middle frontal gyrus and the right caudate, and the left posterior cingulate cortex. Patients with diffuse brain injury were slower than healthy controls on the interference subtask of the Stroop test, suggesting difficulty with resistance to distractions. This finding was associated with activation effects in posterior (mainly parietal) brain areas in addition with activation of previously observed anterior (mainly anterior cingulate) brain regions.

[1]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  H. Imhof,et al.  Cranial MR Imaging and Cerebral 99MTC HM-PAO-Spect in Patients with Subacute or Chronic Severe Closed Head Injury and Normal CT Examinations , 1993, Acta radiologica.

[3]  K. Van Laere,et al.  The classical Stroop interference task as a prefrontal activation probe: a validation study using 99Tcm-ECD brain SPECT , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[4]  D. J. Wyper,et al.  Validation of Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) in Assessing Cerebral Lesions: A Simulation Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[5]  S. Dikmen,et al.  Neuropsychological recovery in patients with moderate to severe head injury: 2 year follow-up. , 1990, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  A. Damasio,et al.  The anatomic basis of pure alexia , 1983, Neurology.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[8]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Philippe Lahorte,et al.  Verbal fluency as a prefrontal activation probe: a validation study using 99mTc-ECD brain SPET , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  J. Adams,et al.  Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: Definition, diagnosis and grading , 1989, Histopathology.

[11]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  Toward clinical application of neuropsychological activation probes with SPECT: a spatial working memory task. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  F. Vidal,et al.  Exploration des troubles attentionnels des traumatisés crâniens avec les potentiels évoqués cognitifs , 2006 .

[13]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus-response compatibility task , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  M. Ichise,et al.  Technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT, CT and MRI in the evaluation of patients with chronic traumatic brain injury: a correlation with neuropsychological performance. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  D. Arciniegas,et al.  Neuropsychiatric aspects of traumatic brain injury , 2000, Current treatment options in neurology.

[16]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  G. Vingerhoets,et al.  Flemish normative data on common neuropsychological tests: Influence of age, education, and gender. , 1997 .

[18]  E. Perret.  The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[20]  A. David.  Stroop effects within and between the cerebral hemispheres: Studies in normals and acallosals , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. A Horse Race of a Different Color: Stroop Interference Patterns With Transformed Words v , 2022 .

[22]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[23]  L. Deecke,et al.  Behavioural and psychosocial sequelae of severe closed head injury and regional cerebral blood flow: a SPECT study. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  T. Shallice,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functions a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Michel Koole,et al.  99mTc-ECD brain perfusion SPET: variability, asymmetry and effects of age and gender in healthy adults , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[28]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  B. Vogt,et al.  Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  D. Stuss,et al.  Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[34]  A. Damasio,et al.  Determinants of performance in color anomia , 1979, Brain and Language.

[35]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies , 1997, NeuroImage.

[36]  K Kouris,et al.  Changes in cerebral perfusion after acute head injury: comparison of CT with Tc-99m HM-PAO SPECT. , 1987, Radiology.

[37]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[38]  M. Kaste,et al.  Speed performance and long‐term functional and vocational outcome in a group of young patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury , 1999, European journal of neurology.

[39]  A. Alavi,et al.  Neuroimaging in patients with head injury. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[40]  S. Roper,et al.  An analysis of cerebral blood flow in acute closed-head injury using technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT and computed tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Deborah Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Stroop Performance in Normal Control Subjects: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[42]  G. Soete,et al.  Course of neuropsychological recovery from moderate-to-severe head injury: a 2-year follow-up , 2001 .

[43]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory , 1995, Nature.

[44]  George Bush,et al.  The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[45]  N R Temkin,et al.  Classification and regression trees (CART) for prediction of function at 1 year following head trauma. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[46]  S. Rauch,et al.  The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[47]  B. Thompson,et al.  MR imaging of head trauma: review of the distribution and radiopathologic features of traumatic lesions. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[48]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Cerebral correlates of disturbed executive function and memory in survivors of severe closed head injury: a SPECT study. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.