Five-level triage system more effective than three-level in tertiary emergency department.

INTRODUCTION The study objectives were to compare reliability and validity of a 3-level (3L) triage system with a new 5-level (5L) triage system and determine the effect of nursing experience on triage reliability. METHODS The study was conducted in a southeastern tertiary emergency department. With a stratified random sample, reliability of 3L triage ratings was measured with weighted kappa (time 1). The 5L system was then implemented, and weighted kappa was remeasured (time 2). Validity was assessed by comparing case mix, sensitivity, and specificity at times 1 and 2, and comparing 5L ratings with physician billing (Evaluation and Management) codes and nursing resource intensity at time 2. RESULTS Time 1 case mix (15,324 patients) was: level 1, 6%; level 2, 36%; level 3, 59%, and time 2 (16,024 patients) was: level 1, 1%; level 2, 8%; level 3, 38%; level 4, 41%; level 5, 13%. Three hundred-five triage ratings were evaluated from time 1, and 303 were evaluated from time 2. Weighted kappa was 0.53 for time 1 and 0.68 for time 2. Spearman correlations were: 5L and nursing resource intensity, 0.55 (P <.0001); and 5L and Em, 0.57 (P <.0001). Sensitivity was 58% for the 3L and 68% for the 5L. Specificity was 83% for the 3L and 91% for the 5L. Under-triage rates were 28% for the 3L and 12% for the 5L, and less-experienced nurses were more likely to under-triage using the 3L system. DISCUSSION The 5L triage system is safer and provides greater discrimination, better reliability, and improved sensitivity and specificity than the 3L triage system.

[1]  J. Gill,et al.  Nonurgent use of the emergency department: appropriate or not? , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  P A Cameron,et al.  Emergency medicine in Australia. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  M. Gifford,et al.  Emergency physicians' and patients' assessments: urgency of need for medical care. , 1980, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[5]  Daniel A. Pollock,et al.  Data Elements for Emergency Department Systems, Release 1.0 (DEEDS): a summary report. , 1998, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  S Read,et al.  Differences in priorities assigned to patients by triage nurses and by consultant physicians in accident and emergency departments. , 1993, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[7]  S. Walter,et al.  Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  G. Jelinek,et al.  The future of casemix in emergency medicine and ambulatory care , 1994, The Medical journal of Australia.

[9]  Richard C. Wuerz,et al.  Inconsistency of Emergency Department Triage , 1998 .

[10]  Daniel A Pollock,et al.  Data Elements for Emergency Department Systems, Release 1.0 (DEEDS): A Summary Report. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[12]  J. M. Gill,et al.  Appropriate or Not , 1994 .

[13]  J. Diamond,et al.  Disagreement among health care professionals about the urgent care needs of emergency department patients. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  R. Wuerz,et al.  Emergency severity index triage category is associated with six-month survival. ESI Triage Study Group. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[15]  K. Grumbach,et al.  Refusing care to emergency department of patients: evaluation of published triage guidelines. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .

[17]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[18]  R C Wuerz,et al.  Implementation and refinement of the emergency severity index. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[19]  T. Wong,et al.  Report of an audit of nurse triage in an accident and emergency department. , 1994, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[20]  J. Bowling,et al.  Emergency department record keeping and the potential for injury surveillance. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  V. Bradley,et al.  Using data to discover new patterns: a triage quality indicator. , 1996, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[22]  B J Skipper,et al.  Triage: limitations in predicting need for emergent care and hospital admission. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.