Visually guided, aimed movements can be unaffected by stimulus–response uncertainty

Response times generally increase linearly with the logarithm of the number of potential stimulus–response alternatives (e.g., Hick’s law). The ubiquity and theoretical importance of this generalization make exceptions particularly interesting. Recently, Kveraga et al. (Exp Brain Res 146:307, 2002) added a third to the two previously known exceptions, demonstrating that saccade latencies were unaffected by stimulus–response uncertainty. They suggest that visually guided saccades are exceptional, because these movements can be automatically selected using a privileged pathway: the topographically organized regions in superior colliculus that convert spatially coded visual activity into spatially coded motor commands. We report that visually guided, aimed hand movements also are unaffected by both stimulus–response uncertainty and stimulus–response repetition. A second experiment demonstrated that this lack of an uncertainty effect persists for equiluminant stimuli. This result suggests that posterior parietal cortex is not the privileged pathway eliminating stimulus–response uncertainty for hand movements. Because hand movements are not guided by mechanisms in the superior colliculus, our results cast doubt on the privileged-pathway hypothesis, at least for hand movements. Instead, the absence of stimulus–response uncertainty may occur only in tasks that do not require the stimulus to be associated with a response effector and that have high stimulus–response compatibility.

[1]  Sabine Dannenberg,et al.  Arm-movement-related neurons in the primate superior colliculus and underlying reticular formation: comparison of neuronal activity with EMGs of muscles of the shoulder, arm and trunk during reaching , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[3]  J Ashe,et al.  Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  A. A. J. Marley,et al.  A Connectionist Model of Choice and Reaction Time in Absolute Identification , 1991 .

[6]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[7]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Principles of Multivariate Analysis , 2001 .

[8]  Leanne Boucher,et al.  Saccades operate in violation of Hick’s law , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. V. Rhoades,et al.  On the Reduction of Choice Reaction Times with Practice , 1959 .

[10]  J. A. Leonard Tactual Choice Reactions: I , 1959 .

[11]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[13]  W. A. Wagenaar Note on the construction of digram-balanced Latin squares. , 1969 .

[14]  D. Sparks,et al.  The deep layers of the superior colliculus. , 1989, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[15]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[16]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Loss of visual information in neglect: the effect of chromatic- versus luminance-contrast stimuli in a “what” task , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[18]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[19]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[20]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Anatomical distribution of arm-movement-related neurons in the primate superior colliculus and underlying reticular formation in comparison with visual and saccadic cells , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[22]  Kestutis Kveraga,et al.  Effects of Directional Uncertainty on Visually-Guided Joystick Pointing , 2005, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  R. Graves Luminance and color effects on localization of briefly flashed visual stimuli , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  Kestutis Kveraga,et al.  Directional Uncertainty in Visually Guided Pointing , 2006, Perceptual and motor skills.

[25]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[26]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review , 2000, Vision Research.

[27]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Les G. Carlton,et al.  Visual Information: The Control of Aiming Movements , 1981 .

[29]  R. Luce,et al.  Decision structure and time relations in simple choice behavior , 1956 .

[30]  P. Schiller,et al.  Single-unit recording and stimulation in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[32]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Neurons in the primate superior colliculus coding for arm movements in gaze-related coordinates. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Motor programming: does the choice of the limb which is to carry out the response imply a delay? , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  H. Hughes,et al.  Smooth pursuit under stimulus-response uncertainty. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[37]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[38]  Glen A. Smith,et al.  Decision Time Unmasked: Individuals Adopt Different Strategies , 1987 .

[39]  G. Pellizzer,et al.  Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Speed—Accuracy Tradeoffs in Aimed Movements: Toward a Theory of Rapid Voluntary Action , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[41]  G ten Hoopen,et al.  Vibrotactual choice reaction time, tactile receptor systems and ideomotor compatibility. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[42]  D. Laming A new interpretation of the relation between choice-reaction time and the number of equiprobable alternatives. , 1966, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[43]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[44]  P. Dixon,et al.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  M. Heath Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. , 2005, Motor control.

[46]  J. Merkel Die zeitlichen Verhältnisse der Willensthätigkeit , 1883 .

[47]  R. Proctor,et al.  Set- and Element-Level Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects for Different Manual Response Sets. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[48]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. , 1969 .

[50]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[51]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[52]  Christopher A. Buneo,et al.  Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching , 2002, Nature.

[53]  G. Mowbray Choice Reaction Times for Skilled Responses* , 1960 .

[54]  A. T. Welford,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SENSORY-MOTOR PERFORMANCE : SURVEY AND REAPPRAISAL OF TWELVE YEARS' PROGRESS , 1960 .