Fate and transport of ambient mercury and applied mercury isotope in terrestrial upland soils: insights from the METAALICUS watershed.

The fate of mercury (Hg) deposited on forested upland soils depends on a wide array of biogeochemical and hydrological processes occurring in the soil landscape. In this study, Hg in soil, soilwater, and streamwater were measured across a forested upland subcatchment of the METAALICUS watershed in northwestern Ontario, Canada, where a stable Hg isotope (spike Hg) was applied to distinguish newly deposited Hg from Hg already resident in the watershed (ambient Hg). In total, we were able to account for 45% of the total mass of spike Hg applied to the subcatchment during the entire loading phase of the experiment, with approximately 22% of the total mass applied now residing in the top 15 cm of the mineral soil layer. Decreasing spike Hg/ambient Hg ratios with depth in the soil and soilwater suggest that spike Hg is less mobile than ambient Hg over shorter time scales. However, the transport of spike Hg into the mineral soil layer is enhanced in depressional areas where water table fluctuation is more extreme. While we expect that this pool of Hg is now effectively sequestered in the mineral horizon, future disturbance of the soil profile could remobilize this stored Hg in runoff.

[1]  D. F. Grigal.  Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: a review. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[2]  H. Biester,et al.  Binding and mobility of mercury in soils contaminated by emissions from chlor-alkali plants. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  M. Ravichandran,et al.  Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter--a review. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Charles T Driscoll,et al.  Ultraviolet absorbance as a proxy for total dissolved mercury in streams. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[6]  Herbert E. Allen,et al.  Kinetics of Mercury(II) Adsorption and Desorption on Soil , 1997 .

[7]  D. B. Kleja,et al.  Partitioning of Hg Between Solid and Dissolved Organic Matter in the Humus Layer of Boreal Forests , 2008 .

[8]  R. J. Hunt,et al.  Speciation and transport of newly deposited mercury in a boreal forest wetland: A stable mercury isotope approach , 2005 .

[9]  M. Richardson,et al.  Water storage dynamics and runoff response of a boreal Shield headwater catchment , 2010 .

[10]  J. Rethemeyer,et al.  Stabilization of dissolved organic matter by sorption to the mineral soil , 2005 .

[11]  R. Hunt,et al.  Comparison of total mercury and methylmercury cycling at five sites using the small watershed approach. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[12]  P. Bloom,et al.  Binding of mercury(II) to reduced sulfur in soil organic matter along upland-peat soil transects , 2000 .

[13]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Temporal stability and transferability of models of willingness to pay for flood control and wetland conservation , 2005 .

[14]  Marc Lucotte,et al.  Recovery of Mercury-Contaminated Fisheries , 2007, Ambio.

[15]  Ji‐Hyung Park,et al.  Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: a review. , 2000 .

[16]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  Predictability of biomass burning in response to climate changes , 2012 .

[17]  Reed C. Harris,et al.  The role of terrestrial vegetation in atmospheric Hg deposition: Pools and fluxes of spike and ambient Hg from the METAALICUS experiment , 2012 .

[18]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Mercury dynamics in relation to dissolved organic carbon concentration and quality during high flow events in three northeastern U.S. streams , 2010 .

[19]  Charles T Driscoll,et al.  Mercury cycling in litter and soil in different forest types in the Adirondack region, New York, USA. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  P. Bloom,et al.  X-ray absorption spectroscopic evidence for the complexation of HG(II) by reduced sulfur in soil humic substances , 1999 .

[21]  P. Bloom,et al.  Binding constants of divalent mercury (Hg2+) in soil humic acids and soil organic matter. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Daniel Obrist,et al.  Fate of mercury in tree litter during decomposition , 2011 .

[23]  D. Engstrom,et al.  Modern and historic atmospheric mercury fluxes in northern Alaska: Global sources and Arctic depletion. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  G. Guggenberger,et al.  The composition of dissolved organic matter in forest soil solutions: changes induced by seasons and passage through the mineral soil , 2002 .

[25]  K. Bencala,et al.  Overview of a simple model describing variation of dissolved organic carbon in an upland catchment , 1996 .

[26]  H. Laudon,et al.  Hydrological mobilization of mercury and dissolved organic carbon in a snow-dominated, forested watershed: Conceptualization and modeling , 2011 .

[27]  Reed C. Harris,et al.  Application of multiple stable mercury isotopes to determine the adsorption and desorption dynamics of Hg(II) and MeHg to sediments , 2004 .

[28]  E. Bringmark,et al.  Occurence and transport of mercury within a small catchment area , 1991 .

[29]  P. Schuster,et al.  Mercury and Organic Carbon Dynamics During Runoff Episodes from a Northeastern USA Watershed , 2007 .

[30]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Imaging and characterization of solute transport during two tracer tests in a shallow aquifer using electrical resistivity tomography and multilevel groundwater samplers , 2010 .

[31]  Heike Knicker,et al.  Contributions of Oi, Oe and Oa horizons to dissolved organic matter in forest floor leachates , 2003 .

[32]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Mercury mobilization and episodic stream acidification during snowmelt: Role of hydrologic flow paths, source areas, and supply of dissolved organic carbon , 2010 .

[33]  G. Guggenberger,et al.  Dissolved organic matter in soil: challenging the paradigm of sorptive preservation , 2003 .

[34]  David Johnson,et al.  Mercury concentrations and pools in four Sierra Nevada forest sites, and relationships to organic carbon and nitrogen , 2009 .

[35]  M. Meili.  The coupling of mercury and organic matter in the biogeochemical cycle — towards a mechanistic model for the boreal forest zone , 1991 .

[36]  J. Munthe,et al.  Mobility and Methylation of Mercury in Forest Soils Development of an In-Situ Stable Isotope Tracer Technique and Initial Results , 2001 .

[37]  G. Mierle,et al.  The role of humic substances in the mobilization of mercury from watersheds , 1991 .

[38]  E. Björn,et al.  Elevated concentrations of methyl mercury in streams after forest clear-cut: a consequence of mobilization from soil or new methylation? , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Reed C. Harris,et al.  Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Mercury Experiment To Assess Atmospheric Loading In Canada and the US. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  E. Schuster,et al.  The behavior of mercury in the soil with special emphasis on complexation and adsorption processes - A review of the literature , 1991 .

[41]  Daniele Andronico,et al.  Analysis of the 2001 lava flow eruption of Mt. Etna from three-dimensional mapping , 2007 .

[42]  P. Bloom,et al.  Complexation of mercury(II) in soil organic matter: EXAFS evidence for linear two-coordination with reduced sulfur groups. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  R. Monson,et al.  Mercury distribution across 14 U.S. Forests. Part I: spatial patterns of concentrations in biomass, litter, and soils. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Role of discrete landscape units in controlling catchment dissolved organic carbon dynamics , 2003 .

[45]  D. Obrist.  Mercury distribution across 14 U.S. forests. Part II: Patterns of methyl mercury concentrations and areal mass of total and methyl mercury. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  N. Roulet,et al.  Runoff generation in zero‐order precambrian shield catchments: The stormflow response of a heterogeneous landscape , 1994 .

[47]  D. Schindler,et al.  Geography and Bathymetry of Selected Lake Basins, Experimental Lakes Area, Northwestern Ontario , 1971 .

[48]  David Schwesig,et al.  Dynamics of mercury and methylmercury in forest floor and runoff of a forested watershed in Central Europe , 2001 .

[49]  M. Scholer,et al.  Microstructure of the heliospheric termination shock: Full particle electrodynamic simulations , 2010 .

[50]  Andrew Heyes,et al.  Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  L. Radke,et al.  Mercury in vegetation and organic soil at an upland boreal forest site in Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan, Canada , 2007 .

[52]  T. Scanlon,et al.  Controls on stream water dissolved mercury in three mid‐Appalachian forested headwater catchments , 2011 .