Understanding the frustration arising from the competition between function, misfolding, and aggregation in a globular protein

Significance The amino acid sequence of a protein encodes a wide range of different properties, including function, folding, and avoidance of aggregation. The resulting requirements on the sequence may be in conflict with each other, thus creating the possibility of misfolding and dysfunction. To investigate possible mechanisms whereby such unwanted outcomes can be prevented, we study the folding process of frataxin, a protein whose aberrant folding is associated with Friedreich’s ataxia. Our results indicate that the regions prone to misfolding are highly protected against aggregation along the folding pathway of this protein. Folding and function may impose different requirements on the amino acid sequences of proteins, thus potentially giving rise to conflict. Such a conflict, or frustration, can result in the formation of partially misfolded intermediates that can compromise folding and promote aggregation. We investigate this phenomenon by studying frataxin, a protein whose normal function is to facilitate the formation of iron–sulfur clusters but whose mutations are associated with Friedreich’s ataxia. To characterize the folding pathway of this protein we carry out a Φ-value analysis and use the resulting structural information to determine the structure of the folding transition state, which we then validate by a second round of rationally designed mutagenesis. The analysis of the transition-state structure reveals that the regions involved in the folding process are highly aggregation-prone. By contrast, the regions that are functionally important are partially misfolded in the transition state but highly resistant to aggregation. Taken together, these results indicate that in frataxin the competition between folding and function creates the possibility of misfolding, and that to prevent aggregation the amino acid sequence of this protein is optimized to be highly resistant to aggregation in the regions involved in misfolding.

[1]  E. Garman,et al.  The structures of frataxin oligomers reveal the mechanism for the delivery and detoxification of iron. , 2006, Structure.

[2]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Localizing frustration in native proteins and protein assemblies , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Pastore,et al.  Understanding the binding properties of an unusual metal‐binding protein − a study of bacterial frataxin , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[4]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  The Mechanism of Folding of Im7 Reveals Competition between Functional and Kinetic Evolutionary Constraints , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  A. Fersht,et al.  Phi-value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  P. Wolynes.  Energy landscapes and solved protein–folding problems , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  P. Wolynes,et al.  On the role of frustration in the energy landscapes of allosteric proteins , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. Akke,et al.  From snapshot to movie: phi analysis of protein folding transition states taken one step further. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Brunori,et al.  Structural characterization of a misfolded intermediate populated during the folding process of a PDZ domain , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding funnels: the nature of the transition state ensemble. , 1996, Folding & design.

[11]  A. Pastore,et al.  The pathogenesis of Friedreich ataxia and the structure and function of frataxin , 2009, Journal of Neurology.

[12]  A. Fersht.  Structure and mechanism in protein science , 1998 .

[13]  Alternative Explanations for "Multistate" Kinetics in Protein Folding: Transient Aggregation and Changing Transition-State Ensembles , 1998 .

[14]  M. Proctor,et al.  Structural changes in the transition state of protein folding: alternative interpretations of curved chevron plots. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[15]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Proteome-level interplay between folding and aggregation propensities of proteins. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  N. Oppenheimer,et al.  Structure and mechanism , 1989 .

[17]  Distinguishing between smooth and rough free energy barriers in protein folding. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[18]  Adrian Gustavo Turjanski,et al.  Protein frustratometer: a tool to localize energetic frustration in protein molecules , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  George S. Hammond,et al.  A Correlation of Reaction Rates , 1955 .

[20]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  Subdomain architecture and stability of a giant repeat protein. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  A. Pastore,et al.  Frataxin: a protein in search for a function , 2013, Journal of neurochemistry.

[22]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Consequences of localized frustration for the folding mechanism of the IM7 protein , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  A PDZ domain recapitulates a unifying mechanism for protein folding , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  S. Proteasa,et al.  Yeast frataxin solution structure, iron binding, and ferrochelatase interaction. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[25]  J. Danielsson,et al.  Functional features cause misfolding of the ALS-provoking enzyme SOD1 , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. Oliveberg,et al.  Transient aggregates in protein folding are easily mistaken for folding intermediates. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Determination of the folding transition states of barnase by using PhiI-value-restrained simulations validated by double mutant PhiIJ-values. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Sheena E. Radford,et al.  Im7 folding mechanism: misfolding on a path to the native state , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[29]  C. Anfinsen,et al.  The kinetics of formation of native ribonuclease during oxidation of the reduced polypeptide chain. , 1961, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Pastore,et al.  A structural approach to understanding the iron-binding properties of phylogenetically different frataxins. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[31]  A. Pastore,et al.  Bacterial frataxin CyaY is the gatekeeper of iron-sulfur cluster formation catalyzed by IscS , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[32]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[33]  Athi N. Naganathan,et al.  Insights into protein folding mechanisms from large scale analysis of mutational effects , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Heather A. O'Neill,et al.  Frataxin Acts as an Iron Chaperone Protein to Modulate Mitochondrial Aconitase Activity , 2004, Science.

[35]  G. Toulouse,et al.  Theory of the frustration effect. II. Ising spins on a square lattice , 1977 .

[36]  M. Karplus,et al.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state , 2001, Nature.

[37]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[38]  M. Brunori,et al.  The kinetics of folding of frataxin. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[39]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Establishing the entatic state in folding metallated Pseudomonas aeruginosa azurin , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  Comparison of successive transition states for folding reveals alternative early folding pathways of two homologous proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  M. Karplus,et al.  Self-consistent determination of the transition state for protein folding: Application to a fibronectin type III domain , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Jane Clarke,et al.  The folding of spectrin domains II: phi-value analysis of R16. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  M. Oliveberg.  Characterisation of the transition states for protein folding: towards a new level of mechanistic detail in protein engineering analysis. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[44]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Transition states and the meaning of Φ-values in protein folding kinetics , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[45]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  The Zyggregator method for predicting protein aggregation propensities. , 2008, Chemical Society reviews.

[46]  A. Pastore,et al.  Yeast Frataxin Is Stabilized by Low Salt Concentrations: Cold Denaturation Disentangles Ionic Strength Effects from Specific Interactions , 2014, PloS one.

[47]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  R. Best,et al.  Protein simulations with an optimized water model: cooperative helix formation and temperature-induced unfolded state collapse. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.