The impact of urban design decisions on net zero energy solar buildings in Sweden

Planning for future energy-efficient and energy-producing buildings requires specific knowledge during the design process. Many design decisions taken by urban planners –form, density, roof type and orientation – have a significant effect on the conditions of such buildings, although urban planners might not always be aware of the effect of their design. This study examines the effects of important design decisions on the solar energy potential of net zero energy solar buildings. Typical Swedish building blocks with varying form, density, roof type and orientation were used to simulate the annual solar irradiation and energy production, and to calculate the load match for heating and electricity under Swedish conditions. Results of this study show that the urban density is the most influential parameter on the solar potential of building blocks. Furthermore, flat roofs often returned the highest load match value, while the effect of orientation on the solar potential turned out not to be that straightforward. With the results of this study, urban planners can make better informed decisions, while it also provides a ground for the net zero energy solar buildings discussion by exposing the boundaries of such buildings in the urban environment.

[1]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Fulfillment of net-zero energy building (NZEB) with four metrics in a single family house with different heating alternatives , 2014 .

[2]  R. Compagnon Solar and daylight availability in the urban fabric , 2004 .

[3]  Andreas K. Athienitis,et al.  The Relationship between Net Energy Use and the Urban Density of Solar Buildings , 2010 .

[4]  Björn Berggren,et al.  Net ZEB office in Sweden – A case study, testing the Swedish Net ZEB definition , 2012 .

[5]  J. Kanters,et al.  Solar energy as a design parameter in urban planning , 2012 .

[6]  Monika Hall,et al.  Two Years of Experience with a Net Zero Energy Balance - Analysis of the Swiss MINERGIE-A Standard , 2014 .

[7]  Andy van den Dobbelsteen,et al.  Space use optimisation and sustainability-environmental assessment of space use concepts. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Eike Musall,et al.  Zero Energy Building A review of definitions and calculation methodologies , 2011 .

[9]  G. Štumberger,et al.  Rating of roofs’ surfaces regarding their solar potential and suitability for PV systems, based on LiDAR data , 2013 .

[10]  Kajsa Flodberg,et al.  Low-energy office buildings using existing technology: simulations with low internal heat gains , 2012 .

[11]  Ergo Pikas,et al.  Cost optimal and nearly zero energy building solutions for office buildings , 2014 .

[12]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  DIVA 2.0: INTEGRATING DAYLIGHT AND THERMAL SIMULATIONS USING RHINOCEROS 3D, DAYSIM AND ENERGYPLUS , 2011 .

[13]  Andy van den Dobbelsteen,et al.  Space use optimisation and sustainability-environmental assessment of space use concepts. , 2004 .

[14]  Maria Wall,et al.  Architects’ design process in solar-integrated architecture in Sweden , 2013 .

[15]  Emmanuel Rey,et al.  Early Design Phase Evaluation Of Urban Solar Potential: Insights From The Analysis Of Six Projects , 2013, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[16]  Paul Fazio,et al.  Solar optimized residential neighborhoods: Evaluation and design methodology , 2013 .

[17]  Karsten Voss,et al.  Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework , 2012 .

[18]  Henrik Davidsson,et al.  Mutual shading of PV modules on flat roofs: a parametric study , 2014 .

[19]  Laura Aelenei,et al.  From Solar Building Design to Net Zero Energy Buildings: Performance Insights of an Office Building , 2014 .

[20]  Milan Prodanovic,et al.  Analysis of Net Zero-energy Building in Spain. Integration of PV, Solar Domestic Hot Water and Air-conditioning Systems , 2014 .

[21]  Samir Bensaid,et al.  Assessing the solar potential of roofs in Valparaíso (Chile) , 2014 .

[22]  Ling Qiu,et al.  Is biodiversity attractive? - on-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. , 2013 .

[23]  Paul Fazio,et al.  Energy performance enhancement in multistory residential buildings , 2014 .

[24]  Maria Wall,et al.  Typical Values for Active Solar Energy in Urban Planning , 2014 .

[25]  Bradley S. Neish,et al.  Methodology for estimating solar potential on multiple building rooftops for photovoltaic systems , 2013 .

[26]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Energy life-cycle approach in Net zero energy buildings balance: Operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study , 2014 .

[27]  Brantley Liddle,et al.  Urban Density and Climate Change: A STIRPAT Analysis Using City-Level Data , 2013 .

[28]  Maria Wall,et al.  The Solar Map as a Knowledge Base for Solar Energy Use , 2014 .