Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: a review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research

An intensive program of 40 years of research has produced various conceptual cognitive and affective approaches to environmental risk perception. In this short review of the most relevant conceptual approaches, appraisal theory is presented as a useful means of integrating cognitive and affective approaches to risk perception. Appraisal theory offers an opportunity to advance our understanding of how environmental risk perception operates in an emotion-specific manner and enables identification of new research directions. Although within other conceptual approaches there are still open research questions, the potential for examining environmental risk perception within appraisal theory has not yet been fully explored. Reviewing current appraisal theoretical models, seven research questions are suggested to structure future research on environmental risk perception.

[1]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Affective Imagery and Acceptance of Replacing Nuclear Power Plants , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Jean-Pascal Assailly,et al.  The Psychology of Risk , 2012 .

[3]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Fear and anger: antecedents and consequences of emotional responses to mobile communication , 2012 .

[4]  S. Kurzenhäuser,et al.  Affect-inducing risk communication: current knowledge and future directions , 2012 .

[5]  A. Göritz,et al.  Dynamics of Trust in Medical Decision Making , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Affect and Implicit Associations: Implications for Risk Perception , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Now What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Klaus R Scherer,et al.  Emotions are emergent processes: they require a dynamic computational architecture , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  K. Scherer The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model , 2009 .

[10]  Leslie D. Kirby,et al.  Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion , 2009 .

[11]  A. Moors Theories of emotion causation: A review , 2009 .

[12]  Virna Vaneza Gutiérrez,et al.  Participant‐focused analysis: explanatory power of the classic psychometric paradigm in risk perception , 2008 .

[13]  Peter M Wiedemann,et al.  Trust in the Safety of Tourist Destinations: Hard to Gain, Easy to Lose? New Insights on the Asymmetry Principle , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Exploring the Triangular Relationship Between Trust, Affect, and Risk Perception: A Review of the Literature , 2008 .

[15]  Ann Bostrom,et al.  Lead is like mercury: risk comparisons, analogies and mental models1 , 2008 .

[16]  A. Spence,et al.  Spontaneous evaluations: Similarities and differences between the affect heuristic and implicit attitudes , 2008 .

[17]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[18]  Henry H. Willis,et al.  The Roles of Group Membership, Beliefs, and Norms in Ecological Risk Perception , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  H. Kastenholz,et al.  Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust , 2007, Appetite.

[20]  Mark T. Spence,et al.  Causes and consequences of emotions on consumer behaviour: A review and integrative cognitive appraisal theory , 2007 .

[21]  Henry H. Willis,et al.  Accounting for Variation in the Explanatory Power of the Psychometric Paradigm: The Effects of Aggregation and Focus , 2007 .

[22]  A. Spence,et al.  Predicting behaviour towards genetically modified food using implicit and explicit attitudes. , 2007, The British journal of social psychology.

[23]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage , 2007 .

[24]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  D. Lashof,et al.  Creating a Climate for Change: Weather or climate change? , 2007 .

[26]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  On the automaticity of emotion , 2007 .

[27]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Social Trust and the Management of Risk , 2006 .

[28]  J. Eiser,et al.  Marginal Trust in Risk Managers: Building and Losing Trust Following Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: Conceptual, empirical, and metatheoretical issues: Reply to Albarracín, Hart, and McCulloch (2006), Kruglanski and Dechesne (2006), and Petty and Briñol (2006). , 2006 .

[30]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Implicit Attitudes Toward Nuclear Power and Mobile Phone Base Stations: Support for the Affect Heuristic , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  Do-Yeong Kim,et al.  Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: a socially facilitated phenomenon. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[32]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Cross‐National Comparisons of Image Associations with “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” Among Laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain , 2006 .

[33]  A. Spence,et al.  Implicit attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) foods: A comparison of context-free and context-dependent evaluations , 2006, Appetite.

[34]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during Otober and November 2005 , 2006 .

[35]  Anthony A Leiserowitz,et al.  American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  M. White,et al.  Information Specificity and Hazard Risk Potential as Moderators of Trust Asymmetry , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  Hans-Rüdiger Pfister,et al.  Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation , 2005 .

[38]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Evolving judgments of terror risks: foresight, hindsight, and emotion. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[39]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Aggregate, Disaggregate, and Hybrid Analyses of Ecological Risk Perceptions , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[40]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  A New Look at the Psychometric Paradigm of Perception of Hazards , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[41]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Emotion processes considered from the perspective of dual-process models , 2005 .

[42]  A. Bostrom,et al.  Weather it's Climate Change? , 2004 .

[43]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Trust, the Asymmetry Principle, and the Role of Prior Beliefs , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[44]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  An Emotion‐Based Model of Risk Perception and Stigma Susceptibility: Cognitive Appraisals of Emotion, Affective Reactivity, Worldviews, and Risk Perceptions in the Generation of Technological Stigma † , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[45]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[46]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[47]  N. Weinstein Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample , 1987, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[48]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems , 1982, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[49]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[50]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[51]  R. Kasperson,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk , 2003 .

[52]  Mattias Viklund Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A Cross‐National Study , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[53]  Gisela Böhm,et al.  Emotional reactions to environmental risks: Consequentialist versus ethical evaluation , 2003 .

[54]  H. Joffe Risk: from perception to social representation. , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[55]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion. , 2003 .

[56]  Margôt Kuttschreuter,et al.  The role of expertise in risk communication: laypeople's and expert's perception of the millennium bug risk in The Netherlands , 2002 .

[57]  J. Lerner,et al.  Fear, anger, and risk. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  B. Teachman,et al.  Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. , 2001, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[59]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  J. Barnett,et al.  Risk Perception and Experience: Hazard Personality Profiles and Individual Differences , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[61]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[62]  J. Lerner,et al.  Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice , 2000 .

[63]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[64]  H. Pfister,et al.  Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[65]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Consequences require antecedents: Toward a process model of emotion elicitation. , 2000 .

[66]  J. Forgas Feeling and thinking : the role of affect in social cognition , 2000 .

[67]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[68]  M. Helweg-Larsen (The Lack of) Optimistic Biases in Response to the 1994 Northridge Earthquake: The Role of Personal Experience , 1999 .

[69]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[70]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  Willett Kempton,et al.  How the Public Views Climate Change , 1997 .

[72]  V T Covello,et al.  The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[73]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Qualitative Mental Models: Simulations or Memories? , 1997 .

[74]  R Shepherd,et al.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[75]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1 , 1996 .

[76]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[77]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[78]  Helmut Jungermann,et al.  Credibility, Information Preferences, and Information Interests , 1995 .

[79]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models , 1994 .

[80]  S. Epstein Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[81]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[82]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect and decision making. , 1993 .

[83]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste , 1991, Science.

[84]  James Flynn,et al.  Risk Perception, Trust, and Nuclear Waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain , 1991 .

[85]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Lay perspectives on global climate change1 , 1991 .

[86]  Karl Dake Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk , 1991 .

[87]  Leroy C. Gould,et al.  Public Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Technology1 , 1989 .

[88]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[89]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[90]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[91]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[92]  A. Tversky,et al.  Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk. , 1983 .

[93]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Lay Foibles and Expert Fables in Judgments about Risk , 1982 .

[94]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Why Study Risk Perception , 1982 .

[95]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[96]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[97]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[98]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[99]  W. H. F. Barnes The Nature of Explanation , 1944, Nature.

[100]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[101]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.