Safety as a key performance indicator: Creating a safety culture for enhanced passenger safety, comfort, and accessibility

Modal shift from private cars to high quality public transport is often seen as a means for improved traffic safety while simultaneously achieving other policy goals. This paper aims to describe safety from a travel-chain perspective and suggests an approach for using accident data as performance indicators. Findings from a recent Swedish case study of bus accidents show that the number of unreported injury cases was very large. Official statistics failed to provide full information and drivers frequently did not report accidents to the bus operators even though they might have resulted in moderate or severe injuries. Because injuries occur travelling to or from the bus stop, during boarding and alighting, and during the ride (braking/accelerating), passengers run the risk of being injured without the bus being involved in a vehicular collision. Non-collision injuries are indicators of poor accessibility, and even “near-injuries” might affect ridership, especially among older users. Thus, it appears that the pertinent organisational/corporate culture does not prioritize safety as a quality factor even though it is sometimes mentioned as a key performance indicator. We discuss means for improved safety culture for all stakeholders and reduce injuries, increase the use of buses, and increase travel quality and comfort.

[1]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[2]  Stephen N. Luko,et al.  Risk Management Principles and Guidelines , 2013 .

[3]  Torbjörn Falkmer,et al.  Is there a pattern in European bus and coach incidents? A literature analysis with special focus on injury causation and injury mechanisms. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  J. Nelson,et al.  Workshop 1: Performance measurement and compliance , 2013 .

[5]  Sidney W A Dekker,et al.  Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[6]  B Corben,et al.  Crash and injury risk of older pedestrians and identification of measures to meet their mobility and safety needs , 2006 .

[7]  D. Hensher,et al.  PERFORMANCE-BASED QUALITY CONTRACTS IN BUS SERVICE PROVISION , 2003 .

[8]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Diagnosis of safety culture in safety management audits , 2000 .

[9]  J. Stanley,et al.  Risk and reward in public transport contracting , 2008 .

[10]  Ulf Björnstig,et al.  Public transport in metropolitan areas -- a danger for unprotected road users , 2002 .

[11]  S. Dekker Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Anders Wretstrand,et al.  Safety--Key Quality Factor in Public Transit for Mobility Impaired People , 2011 .

[13]  Lelia Green,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism in Safety Communication in the Workplace , 2013 .

[14]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Regulation, trust and contractual incentives around transport contracts – Is there anything bus operators can learn from public air service contracts? , 2013 .

[15]  Andrew W Evans,et al.  Interactions between rail and road safety in Great Britain. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Nick Tyler,et al.  Analysis of recent trends in bus and coach safety in Britain , 1993 .

[17]  Anders Wretstrand,et al.  Reducing non-collision injuries in special transportation services by enhanced safety culture. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  A W Evans,et al.  Evaluating public transport and road safety measures. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Agathe Backer-Grøndahl,et al.  Accidents and Unpleasant Incidents: Worry in Transport and Prediction of Travel Behavior , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  R. Daniels,et al.  Public–private contracting and incentives for public transport: Can anything be learned from the Sydney Metro experience? , 2013 .