The Geography of Organic Decomposition Rates

Abstract Decomposition of organic matter is a critical link in the cycling of nutrients through vegetated ecosystems. The primary controls of decay rates are climatic energy and moisture and the chemical-physical nature of the organic matter. A model was developed which uses these controls to predict the geography of decomposition rates for Canada and the United States. Annual actual evapotranspiration (AE) expresses the climatic controls, and the lignin concentration of the organic matter expresses chemical-physical controls. A preliminary model for predicting decay rates was validated using recent field studies. The model showed no consistent pattern of regional under- or overprediction and was therefore used to produce maps of litter that is easy (5 percent initial lignin concentration), intermediate (15 percent), and difficult (30 percent) to decompose. A fourth map presents the geographic variability of lignin's control over decay rates. Decomposition rates in arid areas could not be predicted because of the confounding influence of arthropod activity, especially termites. At a continental scale of analysis climate overwhelms all other controls of decomposition rates, with AE accounting for about three-fourths of the explained variance in decomposition rates. As geographic scale is reduced, the chemical-physical nature of the organic matter and other controls becomes more evident.

[1]  T. Persson.  Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests-an Ecosystem Study. , 1982 .

[2]  John F. Muratore,et al.  Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics , 1982 .

[3]  W. Whitford,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE AET MODEL FOR DECOMPOSITION IN ARID ENVIRONMENTS , 1982 .

[4]  V. Meentemeyer,et al.  World Patterns and Amounts of Terrestrial Plant Litter Production , 1982 .

[5]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  DECOMPOSITION OF CHAPARRAL SHRUB FOLIAGE: LOSSES OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS FROM DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN LEAVES' , 1981 .

[6]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Exceptions to the AET Model: Deserts and Clear‐Cut Forest , 1981 .

[7]  B. S. Ausmus,et al.  A regional approach to litter dynamics in Southern Appalachian forests. , 1980 .

[8]  E. Box,et al.  Geographical dimensions of terrestrial net and gross primary productivity , 1978, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[9]  V. Meentemeyer,et al.  Macroclimate and Lignin Control of Litter Decomposition Rates , 1978 .

[10]  R. Fogel,et al.  Effect of habitat and substrate quality on Douglas fir litter decomposition in western Oregon , 1977 .

[11]  D. Curry.  A REGIONAL APPROACH , 1974 .

[12]  G. Minderman,et al.  Addition, Decomposition and Accumulation of Organic Matter in Forests , 1968 .

[13]  E. Schulze.  Soil Respiration of Tropical Vegetation types , 1967 .

[14]  J. Olson,et al.  Energy Storage and the Balance of Producers and Decomposers in Ecological Systems , 1963 .

[15]  H. Jenny,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DECOMPOSITION RATES OF ORGANIC MATTER IN TEMPERATE AND TROPICAL REGIONS , 1949 .

[16]  S. Waksman,et al.  COMPOSITION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATERIALS AND THEIR DECOMPOSITION IN THE SOIL: IV. THE NATURE AND RAPIDITY OF DECOMPOSITION OF THE VARIOUS ORGANIC COMPLEXES IN DIFFERENT PLANT MATERIALS, UNDER AEROBIC CONDITIONS , 1929 .

[17]  S. Waksman,et al.  The composition of natural organic materials and their decomposition in the soil: I. Methods of quantitative analysis of plant materials , 1927 .

[18]  B. Berg,et al.  Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition. , 1980 .

[19]  J. Olson,et al.  BREAKDOWN OF CONFINED AND NON-CONFINED OAK LITTER , 1963 .