Analytical Evaluation of Squeeze Film Forces in a CMUT With Sealed Air-Filled Cavity

The presence of vacuum inside the cavity of a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) causes the membrane of the device (which is the main vibrating structural component) to deflect towards the substrate, thereby causing a reduction in the effective gap height. This reduction causes a drastic decrease in the pull-in voltage of the device limiting the DC bias at which the device can be operated for maximum efficiency. In addition, this initial deflection of the membrane due to atmospheric pressure, causes significant stress stiffening of the the membrane, changing the natural frequency of the device significantly from the design value. To circumvent the deleterious effects of vacuum in the sealed cavity, we investigate the possibility of using sealed CMUT cavities with air inside at ambient pressure. In order to estimate the transducer loss due to the presence of air in the sealed cavity, we evaluate the resulting damping and determine the forces acting on the vibrating membrane resulting from the compression of the trapped air film. We take into account the flexure of the top vibrating membrane instead of assuming the motion to be parallel-plate like. Towards this end, we solve the linearized Reynolds equation using the appropriate boundary conditions and show that, for a sealed CMUT cavity, the presence of air does not cause any squeeze film damping.

[1]  B. B. Bauer,et al.  Fundamentals of acoustics , 1963 .

[2]  Robert B. Darling,et al.  Compact analytical modeling of squeeze film damping with arbitrary venting conditions using a Green's function approach , 1998 .

[3]  S. Senturia Microsystem Design , 2000 .

[4]  M. Kupnik,et al.  The design and characterization of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) for generating high-intensity ultrasound for transmission of directional audio , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[5]  Suhas S. Mohite,et al.  Squeeze Film Effects in MEMS Devices , 2007 .

[6]  Venkata R. Sonti,et al.  Analytical solutions for the stiffness and damping coefficients of squeeze films in MEMS devices with perforated back plates , 2005 .

[7]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Dynamics of Plates , 2007 .

[8]  M. Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Micro Flows: Fundamentals and Simulation , 2002 .

[9]  Butrus T. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Miniature drumheads: microfabricated ultrasonic transducers , 1998 .

[10]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Surface micromachined capacitive ultrasonic transducers , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  S.T. Hansen,et al.  Air-coupled nondestructive evaluation using micromachined ultrasonic transducers , 1999, 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).

[12]  R. Pratap,et al.  A Compact Squeeze-Film Model Including Inertia, Compressibility, and Rarefaction Effects for Perforated 3-D MEMS Structures , 2008, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[13]  R. Pratap,et al.  The effect of evacuated backside cavity on the dynamic characteristics of a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer , 2010 .

[14]  Rudra Pratap,et al.  A comparative study of analytical squeeze film damping models in rigid rectangular perforated MEMS structures with experimental results , 2008 .

[15]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[16]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[17]  T. Veijola,et al.  Equivalent-circuit model of the squeezed gas film in a silicon accelerometer , 1995 .

[18]  Minhang Bao,et al.  Squeeze film air damping in MEMS , 2007 .

[19]  Mohan D. Rao,et al.  Analytical modeling of squeeze film damping for rectangular elastic plates using Green's functions , 2010 .

[20]  Fook Siong Chau,et al.  Analytical solution of the modified Reynolds equation for squeeze film damping in perforated MEMS structures , 2007 .