Increased Realism in Eyewitness Confidence Judgements: The Effect of Dyadic Collaboration

This study investigated to what extent, and under what circumstances, pair collaboration influences the realism in eyewitness confidence in event memory. The participants first saw a short film clip and then confidence rated their answers to questions on its content. A condition (the Individual-Pair condition) where individual effort preceded pair collaboration showed better calibration compared with a condition (the Simple Pair condition) where no individual effort took place. Furthermore, within the Individual-Pair condition, better calibration, and lower overconfidence, were found in the pair phase compared with the individual phase. The eyewitnesses in the Individual-Pair condition made more realistic judgements of the total number of questions answered correctly. In a control experiment no effect on realism in confidence was found when individuals performed the same task twice. The improved realism in the Individual-Pair condition may partly be explained in terms of the increased accuracy and lowered confidence found for such items where the pair members' had given different answers in the individual phase, and by a risky shift effect for such items where they had given the same answer. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd. (Less)

[1]  Pär Anders Granhag,et al.  Realism in eyewitness confidence as a function of type of event witnessed and repeated recall , 1997 .

[2]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Viewing eyewitness research from a metacognitive perspective. , 1994 .

[3]  V. L. Smith,et al.  Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within- versus between-subjects correlations. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  R. Hastie,et al.  Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments , 1997 .

[5]  Carl Martin Allwood,et al.  Realism in Confidence Judgments as a Function of Working in Dyads or Alone , 1996 .

[6]  G. Stephenson,et al.  An experimental study of social performance and delay on the testimonial validity of story recall , 1983 .

[7]  R. Malpass,et al.  From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[8]  Anders Winman,et al.  Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation , 1996 .

[9]  S. Penrod,et al.  Moderators of the confidence-accuracy correlation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base-rates , 1989 .

[10]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. , 1979, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Arthur A. Stukas,et al.  Interpersonal processes: the interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  Jan Andersson.  Two is one too many : dyadic memory collaboration effects on encoding and retrieval of episodes , 1996 .

[13]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[14]  C. M. Allwood,et al.  THE COGNITIVE INTERVIEW AND ITS EFFECT ON WITNESSES’ CONFIDENCE , 2004 .

[15]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[16]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Availability of Information and the Aggregation of Confidence in Prior Decisions , 1996 .

[17]  Shaw,et al.  Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. , 1996 .

[18]  Accuracy of confidence ratings associated with general knowledge and eyewitness memory , 1993 .

[19]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  The malleability of eyewitness confidence: co-witness and perseverance effects , 1994 .

[20]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. , 1995 .

[21]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Deffenbacher,et al.  Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. , 1987 .

[23]  Leif A. Strömwall,et al.  Effects of reiteration, hindsight bias, and memory on realism in eyewitness confidence , 2000 .

[24]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Origins of the misplaced confidence effect in collaborative recall , 1989 .

[25]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence , 1980 .

[26]  P. Juslin,et al.  Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect. , 2000, Psychological review.

[27]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY : A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES , 1995 .

[28]  Graham J. Hitch,et al.  Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. , 1992 .

[29]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Group Discussion and Judgment , 1983 .

[30]  John S. Shaw,et al.  Repeated postevent questioning can lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence , 1996 .

[31]  C. M. Allwood,et al.  The effects of arguments on realism in confidence judgements , 1996 .

[32]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Collaboration and Memory: Effects of Dyadic Retrieval on Different Memory Tasks , 1996 .

[33]  S. Lichtenstein,et al.  Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?*1 , 1977 .

[34]  C. M. Allwood,et al.  Are Two Judges Better Than One? On the Realism in Confidence Judgements by Pairs and Individuals , 1990 .

[35]  T. Perfect,et al.  Predictive Feeling of Knowing Judgements and Postdictive Confidence Judgements in Eyewitness Memory and General Knowledge , 1996 .

[36]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art , 1977 .

[37]  G. Wells,et al.  Distortions in Eyewitnesses' Recollections: Can the Postidentification-Feedback Effect Be Moderated? , 1999 .

[38]  C. M. Allwood.  Considering the Knowledge You Have: Effects on Realism in Confidence Judgements , 1996 .

[39]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Recall suffers from collaboration: joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity , 1995 .