Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo.

PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of electron-beam computed tomography (CT) with 3.0- and 1.5-mm section thickness for calcium quantification and the prevalence of coronary calcifications with each. MATERIALS AND METHODS Electron-beam CT images were acquired with nonoverlapping 1.5- and 3.0-mm section thickness. Scans were obtained in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom with calcium cylinders of different sizes and densities, as well as in 1,302 study participants. A calcified lesion was defined as a minimum of 2 pixels (area, 0.52 mm2) with a minimum attenuation of 130 HU. The calcified lesions were quantified by means of a volumetric method with isotropic interpolation. From the phantom scans, mean volume scores, SDs, and measurement variations were calculated. From the participant scans, median volume scores and interquartile ranges were calculated. Participants were classified in categories based on cutoff levels for volume score quartiles for the 1.5-mm scans. An intraclass correlation coefficient (kappa value) was calculated as a measure of correlation between categories. RESULTS In the phantom, deviations of calculated volumes from the true cylinder volumes and measurement variations were generally higher for the 3.0-mm protocol than for the 1.5-mm protocol. In the participants, the median volume score was 100 mm3 (interquartile range, 11-409 mm3) for the 3.0-mm protocol and 144 mm3 (interquartile range, 35-513 mm3) for the 1.5-mm protocol. Agreement between classifications of volume scores for the 1.5- and 3.0-mm scans was good (kappa = 0.62, P <.001). Compared with the quartile classification for the 1.5-mm scan, however, classifications for 370 (28%) participants were put in a different category with the 3.0-mm protocol. CONCLUSION In a phantom, electron-beam CT scans with 3.0-mm section thickness yield less accurate estimates of calcified volume than do 1.5-mm scans. Electron-beam CT protocols with thinner sections considerably affect classification of individuals on the basis of the amount of coronary calcification depicted.

[1]  T. Callister,et al.  Sensitivity of two electron beam tomography protocols for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  Impact of motion artefact on the measurement of coronary calcium score. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  T. Callister,et al.  Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  J. Gardin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  L. Bielak,et al.  Coronary artery calcification measured at electron-beam CT: agreement in dual scan runs and change over time. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[8]  L E Ginzton,et al.  Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near-term future coronary events in high-risk adults. , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT: in vitro assessment of effect of radiation dose. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  S. Rich,et al.  Reproducibility of the measurement of coronary calcium with ultrafast computed tomography. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  J G Goldin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[12]  T. Callister,et al.  Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  Y. Arad,et al.  Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Budoff,et al.  EKG-triggered CT data acquisition to reduce variability in coronary arterial calcium score. , 2002, Radiology.

[15]  R. Detrano,et al.  Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. , 1996, American heart journal.

[16]  A. Hofman,et al.  Coronary calcification detected by electron-beam computed tomography and myocardial infarction. The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. , 2002, European heart journal.

[17]  M. Reiser,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  T. Callister,et al.  Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. , 2000, Circulation.