Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: a framework for design

We present rich descriptions of taste experience through an analysis of the diachronic and synchronic experiences of each of the five basic taste qualities: sweet, sour, salt, bitter, and umami. Our findings, based on a combination of user experience evaluation techniques highlight three main themes: temporality, affective reactions, and embodiment. We present the taste characteristics as a framework for design and discuss each taste in order to elucidate the design qualities of individual taste experiences. These findings add a semantic understanding of taste experiences, their temporality enhanced through descriptions of the affective reactions and embodiment that the five basic tastes elicit. These findings are discussed on the basis of established psychological and behavioral phenomena, highlighting the potential for taste-enhanced design.

[1]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Digital taste and smell communication , 2011, BODYNETS.

[2]  P. Desmet,et al.  Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience , 2008, Appetite.

[3]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[4]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Food and interaction design: designing for food in everyday life , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Assessing crossmodal correspondences in exotic fruit juices: The case of shape and sound symbolism , 2013 .

[6]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[8]  Pierre Vermersch,et al.  L'entretien d'explicitation , 2014 .

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Technology at the dining table , 2013, Flavour.

[10]  Markus Löchtefeld,et al.  Morphees: toward high "shape resolution" in self-actuated flexible mobile devices , 2013, CHI.

[11]  Lina Engelen,et al.  Food Oral Processing: Fundamentals of Eating and Sensory Perception , 2012 .

[12]  C. J. Overbeeke,et al.  Expressing tastes in packages , 1995 .

[13]  Paul Tosey,et al.  Exploring inner landscapes through psychophenomenology: the contribution of neuro-linguistic programming to innovations in researching first person experience , 2010 .

[14]  Richard Harper,et al.  Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[15]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[16]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  An ecological valence theory of human color preference , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  P. Desmet,et al.  Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience , 2013 .

[18]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste , 2003 .

[19]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Laying the table for HCI: uncovering ecologies of domestic food consumption , 2012, CHI.

[20]  Ian Wakeling,et al.  Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested , 1995 .

[21]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Playful taste interaction , 2013, IDC.

[22]  B Cowart,et al.  Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. , 1996, Chemical senses.

[23]  Kristina Höök,et al.  The sensual evaluation instrument: developing an affective evaluation tool , 2006, CHI.

[24]  J. Glendinning,et al.  Is the bitter rejection response always adaptive? , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[25]  Michel Rogeaux,et al.  Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity , 2009 .

[26]  Ryohei Nakatsu,et al.  Taste/IP: the sensation of taste for digital communication , 2012, ICMI '12.

[27]  Takuji Narumi,et al.  Augmented reality flavors: gustatory display based on edible marker and cross-modal interaction , 2011, CHI.

[28]  Karolin Hoehl,et al.  Water quality and taste sensitivity for basic tastes and metallic sensation , 2010 .

[29]  Dan Maynes-Aminzade,et al.  Edible Bits: Seamless Interfaces between People, Data and Food , 2005 .

[30]  C. Spence.  Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Leticia Ramírez-Lugo,et al.  Taste memory formation: Latest advances and challenges , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[33]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic taste responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil among adults: a screening tool for epidemiological studies. , 2001, Chemical senses.

[34]  Claire Petitmengin,et al.  Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness , 2006 .

[35]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[36]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  The temporal change in the cortical activations due to salty and sweet tastes in humans: fMRI and time–intensity sensory evaluation , 2012, Neuroreport.

[37]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  An ecological valence theory of human color preferences , 2010 .

[38]  Ann Light,et al.  Adding method to meaning: A technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[39]  Neil Savage,et al.  Technology: The taste of things to come , 2012, Nature.

[40]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  LOLLio: exploring taste as playful modality , 2013, TEI '13.