Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments

We designed two computational models to replicate human facial attractiveness ratings. The primary model used partial least squares (PLS) to identify image factors associated with facial attractiveness from facial images and attractiveness ratings of those images. For comparison we also made a model similar to previous models of facial attractiveness, in that it used manually derived measurements between features as inputs, though we took the additional step of dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis (PCA) and weighting of PCA dimensions via a perceptron. Strikingly, both models produced estimates of facial attractiveness that were indistinguishable from human ratings. Because PLS extracts a small number of image factors from the facial images that covary with attractiveness ratings of the images, it is possible to determine the information used by the model. The image factors that the model discovered correspond to two of the main contemporary hypotheses of averageness judgments: facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism. In contrast, facial symmetry was not important to the model, and an explicit feature-based measurement of symmetry was not correlated with human judgments of facial attractiveness. This provides novel evidence for the importance of averageness and sexual dimorphism, but not symmetry, in human judgments of facial attractiveness.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[3]  A. O'Toole,et al.  The perception of face gender: The role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Classifying adults' and children's faces by sex: computational investigations of subcategorical feature encoding , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  Preprocessing images of faces: correlations with human perceptions of distinctiveness and familiarity , 1995 .

[6]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[7]  Michael J. Lyons,et al.  Perception psychology: Visual structure of a Japanese Zen garden , 2002, Nature.

[8]  J. Fellous,et al.  Emotions: from brain to robot , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.

[10]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Predictive Codes for Forthcoming Perception in the Frontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[12]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[14]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[18]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Trait Impressions as Overgeneralized Responses to Adaptively Significant Facial Qualities: Evidence from Connectionist Modeling , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[19]  Danh V. Nguyen,et al.  Tumor classification by partial least squares using microarray gene expression data , 2002, Bioinform..

[20]  D. Ariely,et al.  Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value fMRI and Behavioral Evidence , 2001, Neuron.

[21]  Johannes Hönekopp,et al.  Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  M. Cunningham Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female f , 1986 .

[23]  F. Newell,et al.  Familiarity Breeds Attraction: Effects of Exposure on the Attractiveness of Typical and Distinctive Faces , 2004, Perception.

[24]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Nature Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom: The Multiple Ways and Wherefores of Attractiveness , 2002 .

[25]  M. Cunningham Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[26]  T. Valentine,et al.  Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  B. Murphy,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2022 .

[28]  Richard Russell,et al.  Sex, Beauty, and the Relative Luminance of Facial Features , 2003, Perception.

[29]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[31]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[33]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[34]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.