MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis

In multiple sclerosis (MS), diffuse brain parenchymal damage exceeding focal inflammation is increasingly recognized to be present from the very onset of the disease, and, although occult to conventional imaging techniques, may present a major cause of permanent neurological disability. Subtle tissue alterations significantly influence biomechanical properties given by stiffness and internal friction, that--in more accessible organs than the brain--are traditionally assessed by manual palpation during the clinical exam. The brain, however, is protected from our sense of touch, and thus our current knowledge on cerebral viscoelasticity is very limited. We developed a clinically feasible magnetic resonance elastography setup sensitive to subtle alterations of brain parenchymal biomechanical properties. Investigating 45 MS patients revealed a significant decrease (13%, P<0.001) of cerebral viscoelasticity compared to matched healthy volunteers, indicating a widespread tissue integrity degradation, while structure-geometry defining parameters remained unchanged. Cerebral viscoelasticity may represent a novel in vivo marker of neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative pathology.

[1]  M W Weiner,et al.  Evaluation of treatment effects in Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases by MRI and MRS , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[2]  Richard L Ehman,et al.  Evaluation of healthy and diseased muscle with magnetic resonance elastography. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Accurate, Robust, and Automated Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Brain Change Analysis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  A. Manduca,et al.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[6]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Asbach,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[10]  Jürgen Braun,et al.  Shear wave group velocity inversion in MR elastography of human skeletal muscle , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Ned H. Kalin,et al.  Gender differences in brain volume and size of corpus callosum and amygdala of rhesus monkey measured from MRI images , 2000, Brain Research.

[12]  F. Barkhof The clinico‐radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited , 2002, Current opinion in neurology.

[13]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  Non‐invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[16]  I. Sack,et al.  Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  MR elastography of breast lesions: Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast‐enhanced MR mammography , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  C. Lucchinetti,et al.  The Pathology of MS: New Insights and Potential Clinical Applications , 2007, The neurologist.

[20]  Frauke Zipp,et al.  The brain as a target of inflammation: common pathways link inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  Jochen Guck,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  D. V. Essen,et al.  A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system , 1997, Nature.

[23]  A. Manduca,et al.  MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  The “gender gap” in autoimmune disease , 2000, The Lancet.

[25]  Frauke Zipp,et al.  Changes in cerebral perfusion precede plaque formation in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal perfusion MRI study. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  F. Paul,et al.  Perivascular spaces--MRI marker of inflammatory activity in the brain? , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  J.M.A. Lenihan,et al.  Biomechanics — Mechanical properties of living tissue , 1982 .

[28]  A. J. Thompson,et al.  Magnetic resonance studies of abnormalities in the normal appearing white matter and grey matter in multiple sclerosis , 2003, Journal of Neurology.

[29]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  In Vivo Determination of Hepatic Stiffness Using Steady-State Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Elastography , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[30]  I. Sack,et al.  Horizontal shear wave scattering from a nonwelded interface observed by magnetic resonance elastography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .