Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces’ sex: Evidence from eye-tracking data

Previous research has shown that during recognition of frontal views of faces, the preferred landing positions of eye fixations are either on the nose or the eye region. Can these findings generalize to other facial views and a simpler perceptual task? An eye-tracking experiment investigated categorization of the sex of faces seen in four views. The results revealed a strategy, preferred in all views, which consisted of focusing gaze within an 'infraorbital region' of the face. This region was fixated more in the first than in subsequent fixations. Males anchored gaze lower and more centrally than females.

[1]  S. Bentin,et al.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[2]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  Verne S. Caviness,et al.  Prosopagnosia as a Deficit in Encoding Curved Surface , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  H L Kundel,et al.  Searching for lung nodules. A comparison of human performance with random and systematic scanning models. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[5]  H. B. Kaplan.  Sex differences in social interest. , 1991 .

[6]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  A. O'Toole,et al.  An ‘other-Race Effect’ for Categorizing Faces by Sex , 1996, Perception.

[8]  J. Salzmann.  Handbook of facial growth , 1977 .

[9]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[10]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers , 2003, Ergonomics.

[11]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  Face Recognition: Features Versus Templates , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  T. Ikeda,et al.  Sex differences in the zygomatic angle in japanese patients analyzed by MRI with reference to moiré fringe patterns , 1999, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[13]  P. Schyns,et al.  Show Me the Features! Understanding Recognition From the Use of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[14]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  H. Abdi,et al.  Principal Component and Neural Network Analyses of Face Images: What Can Be Generalized in Gender Classification? , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[17]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  SEXNET: A Neural Network Identifies Sex From Human Faces , 1990, NIPS.

[18]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[19]  D. Perrett,et al.  What Gives a Face its Gender? , 1993, Perception.

[20]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  P. Sinha,et al.  The Role of Eyebrows in Face Recognition , 2003, Perception.

[22]  R. Lippa.  Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  P. Schyns,et al.  Receptive Fields for Flexible Face Categorizations , 2004, Psychological science.

[24]  G. H. Fisher,et al.  Recognizing human faces. , 1975, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[26]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  In the eye of the beholder , 2000, Nature.

[27]  Johan Eriksson,et al.  Looking as if you know: Systematic object inspection precedes object recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[28]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  A Principled Method for Determining the Functionality of ERP Components. , 2003 .

[30]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  Real Men Don't Look Down: Direction of Gaze Affects Sex Decisions on Faces , 1996 .

[31]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of occluded targets , 2000, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  E Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of eccentric forms. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  A. M. Burton,et al.  What's the Difference between Men and Women? Evidence from Facial Measurement , 1993, Perception.

[35]  Michael F. Land,et al.  From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  V. Bruce,et al.  Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition , 2008, Psychological science.

[38]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Organization of face and object recognition in modular neural network models , 1999, Neural Networks.

[39]  Bjarne Stroustrup,et al.  The C++ programming language (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[40]  Erik Blaser,et al.  The accuracy and precision of saccades to small and large targets , 1995, Vision Research.

[41]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Eye movements are functional during face learning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[42]  N. Scott-Samuel,et al.  Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans , 2005, Vision Research.

[43]  P. Schyns,et al.  A principled method for determining the functionality of brain responses , 2003, Neuroreport.

[44]  E. Chronicle,et al.  You Can Tell by the Nose—Judging Sex from an Isolated Facial Feature , 1995, Perception.

[45]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Face-gender discrimination is possible in the near-absence of attention. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[46]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Effects of perceived mutual gaze and gender on face processing and recognition memory , 2005 .

[47]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Spatial summation of face information , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[48]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.

[49]  Susanne Huber,et al.  Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[50]  T. Paus,et al.  Cortical regions involved in eye movements, shifts of attention, and gaze perception , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[51]  M J Tarr,et al.  What Object Attributes Determine Canonical Views? , 1999, Perception.

[52]  B. Laeng,et al.  On Facial Expertise: Processing Strategies of Twins' Parents , 2008, Perception.

[53]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization in the presence of cues to three-dimensional shape. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[54]  I. Biederman,et al.  Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. , 1987 .

[55]  R. Pabst,et al.  Sobotta atlas human anatomy , 2012 .

[56]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it!: An fMRI investigation , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[57]  Sasan Mahmoodi,et al.  How do monkeys view faces?—a study of eye movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it's in the eyes , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  T. Langdell,et al.  Recognition of faces: an approach to the study of autism. , 1978, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[60]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: an exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[61]  P. Benson,et al.  More about Brows: How Poses That Change Brow Position Affect Perceptions of Gender , 1999, Perception.

[62]  J. Findlay.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[63]  M. Platt,et al.  Reflexive Social Attention in Monkeys and Humans , 2003, Current Biology.

[64]  S. Coren,et al.  Effect of Non-Target Stimuli upon Length of Voluntary Saccades , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[65]  D. I. Perrett,et al.  Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns? , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  B. Laeng,et al.  Canonical views of faces and the cerebral hemispheres , 2001, Laterality.

[67]  I Biederman,et al.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[68]  P. Castelein.  Facial growth. , 1971, Dental student.

[69]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[70]  M. Young,et al.  Longer fixation duration while viewing face images , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[71]  K. Turano,et al.  Oculomotor strategies for the direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity , 2003, Vision Research.

[72]  H. Ellis,et al.  Parallel processing of the sex and familiarity of faces. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[73]  A J O'Toole,et al.  More about the Difference between Men and Women: Evidence from Linear Neural Networks and the Principal-Component Approach , 1995, Perception.

[74]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  John M. Findlay,et al.  Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy? , 2009, Vision Research.

[76]  S. Bem.  Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. , 1981 .

[77]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  A Perceptron Reveals the Face of Sex , 1995, Neural Computation.

[78]  J M Findlay,et al.  Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception , 2013, Perception.

[79]  N. J. Cohen,et al.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[80]  A. O'Toole,et al.  The perception of face gender: The role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[81]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  The effects of visual attention and object affordance on the on-line control of arm movements , 2004 .

[82]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Sex Classification is Better with Three-Dimensional Head Structure Than with Image Intensity Information , 1997, Perception.

[83]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[84]  Bjarne Stroustrup,et al.  C++ Programming Language , 1986, IEEE Softw..

[85]  R. Lippa.  Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[86]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  A physical system approach to recognition memory for spatially transformed faces , 1988, Neural Networks.

[87]  Aaron B. Hoffman,et al.  Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[88]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. , 1998, Psychophysiology.