A hybrid model for cloud providers and consumers to agree on QoS of cloud services

This paper describes a new agenda based approach which facilitates multi-issue negotiation process between service consumer and service provider over the quality of service (QoS) requirements in cloud services. We assume that the order of agenda (issues) has impact on the negotiation outcome, but a group of service consumers and providers may have conflicting preferences over the importance of issues. In a multiple-issue negotiation process it is difficult to reach an optimal outcome when their preferences and the relative importance of their associated issues are not known to each other. The proposed agenda based preference ordering approach helps consumers and providers to reach a consensus over the issues and to construct a common preference sequence to improve the efficiency of the issue-by-issue negotiation outcome. Consequently, a co-evolutionary negotiation model based on the result of preference ordering approach is introduced for the agents to negotiate and reach an agreement, if there is any. The contribution of the research is a new mechanism that is able to formulate issue sequence along with a co-evolutionary negotiation approach that can effectively facilitate negotiation over QoS issues in cloud computing. Finally, a case study is provided to illustrate the proposed approach. This research has proposed a new negotiation mechanism to deal with the Cloud Computing Market.The negotiation mechanism can efficiently and effectively identify a possible agreement in a large and complex search space.A case study is adopted to evaluate and demonstrate the proposed mechanism.

[1]  Barbara Pernici,et al.  An architecture for flexible Web service QoS negotiation , 2005, Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'05).

[2]  Xianrong Zheng,et al.  QoS Representation, Negotiation and Assurance in Cloud Services , 2014 .

[3]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation , 2004, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  F. Leon,et al.  Real-valued quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for multi-issue multi-lateral negotiation , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing.

[6]  Roman Inderst,et al.  Multi-issue Bargaining with Endogenous Agenda , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[7]  Kuo-Ming Chao,et al.  A fuzzy group decision making process in a multi-agent negotiation environment , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).

[8]  Bo An,et al.  Automated negotiation with decommitment for dynamic resource allocation in cloud computing , 2010, AAMAS.

[9]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Group Decision-Making Model With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[10]  Vladimir Stantchev,et al.  Negotiating and Enforcing QoS and SLAs in Grid and Cloud Computing , 2009, GPC.

[11]  Lutz-Alexander Busch,et al.  Endogenous Incomplete Contracts: A Bargaining Approach , 1999 .

[12]  Yong Yuan,et al.  Co-evolutionary stability in the alternating-offer negotiation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems.

[13]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Sameer Tyagi,et al.  Java Web Services Architecture , 2003 .

[15]  Lutz-Alexander Busch,et al.  A Comment on Issue-by-Issue Negotiations , 1997 .

[16]  Kwang Mong Sim,et al.  Agent-Based Cloud Computing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[17]  C. Fershtman,et al.  The Importance of the Agenda in Bargaining , 1990 .

[18]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal agendas for multi-issue negotiation , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[19]  Przemyslaw Grzegorzewski,et al.  Trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[20]  Ching-Hsue Cheng A simple fuzzy group decision making method , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[21]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[22]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments , 2001, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.

[23]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[24]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Automated SLA Negotiation Framework for Cloud Computing , 2013, 2013 13th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing.

[25]  Roberto Serrano,et al.  Agenda Restrictions in Multi-Issue Bargaining , 2004 .

[26]  Kuo-Ming Chao,et al.  Preference Ordering in Agenda Based Multi-issue Negotiation for Service Level Agreement , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[27]  Miriam A. M. Capretz,et al.  Integration of business process modeling and Web services: a survey , 2014, Service Oriented Computing and Applications.

[28]  Da Ruan,et al.  Multi-Objective Group Decision Making - Methods, Software and Applications with Fuzzy Set Techniques(With CD-ROM) , 2007, Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[29]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Daniel Pakkala,et al.  A survey of methods and approaches for reliable dynamic service compositions , 2013, Service Oriented Computing and Applications.

[31]  Kwang Mong Sim Agent-based Cloud commerce , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[32]  Liviu Dan Serban,et al.  A time-constrained SLA negotiation strategy in competitive computational grids , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[33]  Patrick Martin,et al.  A Policy-Based Middleware for Web Services SLA Negotiation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Web Services.

[34]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[35]  Jianhua Ma,et al.  An experience-based evolutionary negotiation model , 2003, Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. ICCIMA 2003.

[36]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..