To what extent does routine television news supply citizens with essential political information? To what extent are routine stories sensationalized so that their informational content is diluted or obscured? How do television news directors frame routine news stories and rationalize the mix of factual reporting and dramatization that they present? To answer these questions, television news producers were presented with hypothetical routine news events and asked to construct news presentations and explain their framing rationales. The content of actual routine news stories was also analyzed for comparisons with the hypothetical accounts. The data indicate that both actual and hypothetical routine television news stories are designed and executed to answer the who, what, where and when questions that provide essential information to citizens. But they slight the why and how questions that would assist viewers in placing the facts into a more meaningful perspective. Framing is deliberately dramatic so that the policy-relevant aspects of news are often overshadowed by entertainment features.
[1]
D. Graber.
Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide
,
1984
.
[2]
S. Iyengar,et al.
News That Matters: Television and American Opinion
,
1987
.
[3]
M. A. Milburn,et al.
The Dramatic Presentation of News and Its Effects on Cognitive Complexity
,
1992
.
[4]
Gaye Tuchman.
Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality
,
1978
.
[5]
Nightly Horrors: Crisis Coverage by Television Network News
,
1985
.
[6]
P. Ekman.
Emotion in the human face
,
1982
.
[7]
M. Tracey.
The production of political television
,
1977
.
[8]
John P. Robinson,et al.
The Main Source: Learning from Television News
,
1986
.
[9]
Richard A. Brody,et al.
Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology
,
1991
.