Spectrum management reform: Rethinking practices

Unparalleled growth in wireless communications has increased the pressure for more spectrum to support more users, more uses and more capacity. To alleviate that pressure, major regulatory changes were introduced in several countries in two key areas of spectrum management, namely spectrum assignment and allocation. This paper analyzes those changes and discusses strategies and tactics for deregulating the use of radio spectrum. Spectrum management reforms are considered within the theoretical framework of transition economics, which is concerned with optimal reform speed and sequencing. The paper shows how Anglo-Saxon and European countries have been implementing gradual reforms. Meanwhile, Central American reformers have chosen a fast transition from command-and-control regulation to market mechanisms. Transition economics is used to evaluate the advantages and drawbacks of different spectrum reform strategies.

[1]  Peter C. Murrell,et al.  The Transition According to Cambridge, Mass. , 1995 .

[2]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  Optimal Abolition of FCC Spectrum Allocation , 2008 .

[3]  Martin Cave.  Anti-competitive behaviour in spectrum markets: Analysis and response , 2010 .

[4]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  Spectrum Allocation in Latin America: An Economic Analysis , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[5]  Benoit Pierre Freyens,et al.  Allocative vs. technical spectrum efficiency , 2011 .

[6]  Hans Pitlik.  A race to liberalization? Diffusion of economic policy reform among OECD-economies , 2007 .

[7]  Thomas W. Hazlett.  Property Rights and Wireless License Values , 2004 .

[8]  Martin Cave,et al.  The unfinished history of usage rights for spectrum , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[9]  B. Wellenius,et al.  Managing the Radio Spectrum: Framework for Reform in Developing Countries , 2008 .

[10]  Gerald R. Faulhaber.  The Question of Spectrum: Technology, Management, and Regime Change , 2005, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[11]  C. Jackson.  Coase and the New Zealand Spectrum Reforms , 2011, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[12]  Mathias Dewatripont,et al.  The Design of Reform Packages under Uncertainty , 1995 .

[13]  Erik Bohlin,et al.  A common European spectrum policy: Barriers and prospects , 2007 .

[14]  John McMillan,et al.  HOW TO REFORM A PLANNED ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM CHINA , 1992 .

[15]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  Property Rights to Radio Spectrum in Guatemala and El Salvador: An Experiment in Liberalization , 2006 .

[16]  Arturas Medeisis,et al.  Pluralistic licensing , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[17]  Patrick Xavier,et al.  Policy issues in spectrum trading , 2006 .

[18]  Benoit Pierre Freyens.  A policy spectrum for spectrum economics , 2009, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[19]  William Webb.  An optimal way to licence the radio spectrum , 2009 .

[20]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Toward an Evolutionary Regime for Spectrum Governance: Licensing or Unrestricted Entry? , 2006 .

[21]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  Liberalizing US spectrum allocation , 2003 .

[22]  Mark E. Schaffer,et al.  Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms , 2002 .

[23]  Lucas Smith,et al.  Radio Spectrum Policy Group , 2014 .

[24]  Radio Spectrum Management for a Converging World , 2004 .

[25]  Gerard Pogorel,et al.  Nine Regimes of Radio Spectrum Management: A 4-Step Decision Guide , 2007 .

[26]  Peter C. Murrell,et al.  Evolutionary and radical approaches to economic reform , 1992, Economics of Planning.

[27]  Giancarlo Ibarguen,et al.  Liberating the radio spectrum in Guatemala , 2003 .

[28]  Martin Cave,et al.  Essentials of Modern Spectrum Management: Frontmatter , 2007 .