Design of Battery Electrodes with Dual‐Scale Porosity to Minimize Tortuosity and Maximize Performance

Advances in materials and electrode architecture have facilitated remarkable improvements in the power performance of rechargeable batteries over the past decade, as represented by laboratory demonstrations of fast discharge [ 1–3 ] and commercial realizations such as packaged Li-ion cells with > 20 kW/kg at ∼ 65 Wh/kg. [ 4 ] However, even the most advanced of today’s batteries continue to have poor materials utilization, with only ∼ 50% of cell volume devoted to active materials in cells designed for high-energy density. [ 5 ] Thus, emphasis has now shifted towards maximizing energy density while retaining suffi cient rate capability to power critical applications such as portable devices and electric vehicles. In batteries using porous electrodes, cell-level energy density increases with electrode thickness and density, until limitations on accessible capacity are imposed by inadequate ion transport through a diminishing volume of tortuous, electrolyte-fi lled porosity. [ 6,7 ] For electrodes in which electronic conductivity and charge-transfer are not rate-limiting, ion transport in the percolating electrolyte network becomes limiting as current density increases beyond a critical value. [ 6 , 8 ] Since tortuosity τ , increases nonlinearly with density (e.g., following the Bruggeman relationship τ ∝ ε − 1/2 , where ε is pore fraction), attempts to increase cell energy density by densifying the electrodes rapidly reach diminishing returns. (Throughout, we defi ne τ = ε ( σ 0 / σ ), with ε the volume fraction porosity, σ a measured transport coeffi cient, and σ 0 the value of the transport coeffi cient for the porefi lling medium). Efforts to increase cell-level energy density by increasing electrode thickness (i.e., reducing inactive materials such as separators and current collectors) likewise incur electrolyte-transport limitations. Measured electrode tortuosities vary widely with electrode porosity and preparation, but commonly range between 2.5–30, [ 8–10 ] implying signifi cant room

[1]  Xiangyun Song,et al.  A comprehensive understanding of electrode thickness effects on the electrochemical performances of Li-ion battery cathodes , 2012 .

[2]  Paul V. Braun,et al.  Three-dimensional bicontinuous ultrafast-charge and -discharge bulk battery electrodes. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[3]  R. Braatz,et al.  Optimal Porosity Distribution for Minimized Ohmic Drop across a Porous Electrode , 2010 .

[4]  Jong-Sung Yu,et al.  Ordered multimodal porous carbon with hierarchical nanostructure for high Li storage capacity and good cycling performance , 2010 .

[5]  Thomas F. Marinis,et al.  Ultrahigh‐Energy‐Density Microbatteries Enabled by New Electrode Architecture and Micropackaging Design , 2010, Advanced materials.

[6]  John R. Owen,et al.  How the electrolyte limits fast discharge in nanostructured batteries and supercapacitors , 2009 .

[7]  K. Zaghib,et al.  Quantifying tortuosity in porous Li-ion battery materials , 2009 .

[8]  Byoungwoo Kang,et al.  Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging , 2009, Nature.

[9]  G. Lindbergh,et al.  Impedance as a Tool for Investigating Aging in Lithium-Ion Porous Electrodes I. Physically Based Electrochemical Model , 2008 .

[10]  Yu-Guo Guo,et al.  Superior Electrode Performance of Nanostructured Mesoporous TiO2 (Anatase) through Efficient Hierarchical Mixed Conducting Networks , 2007 .

[11]  Sarmimala Hore,et al.  Synthesis of Hierarchically Porous Carbon Monoliths with Highly Ordered Microstructure and Their Application in Rechargeable Lithium Batteries with High‐Rate Capability , 2007 .

[12]  Robert Dominko,et al.  Wired Porous Cathode Materials: A Novel Concept for Synthesis of LiFePO4 , 2007 .

[13]  Robert Dominko,et al.  Mass and charge transport in hierarchically organized storage materials. Example: Porous active materials with nanocoated walls of pores , 2006 .

[14]  Justin C. Lytle,et al.  Photonic Crystal Structures as a Basis for a Three‐Dimensionally Interpenetrating Electrochemical‐Cell System , 2006 .

[15]  John W. Halloran,et al.  Fabrication of Microconfigured Multicomponent Ceramics , 2005 .

[16]  Ayman F. Abouraddy,et al.  Metal–insulator–semiconductor optoelectronic fibres , 2004, Nature.

[17]  Bruce Dunn,et al.  Hierarchical battery electrodes based on inverted opal structures , 2002 .

[18]  Y. Chiang,et al.  Electronically conductive phospho-olivines as lithium storage electrodes , 2002, Nature materials.

[19]  R. Moshtev,et al.  State of the art of commercial Li ion batteries , 2000 .

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[21]  Adrian Bejan,et al.  Constructal tree networks for the time-dependent discharge of a finite-size volume to one point , 1998 .

[22]  M. Doyle,et al.  Analysis of capacity–rate data for lithium batteries using simplified models of the discharge process , 1997 .

[23]  Williams,et al.  Surface and bulk tortuosity of porous ceramics near the percolation threshold. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[24]  Tadeusz Bak,et al.  Modification in the electronic structure of cobalt bronze LixCoO2 and the resulting electrochemical properties , 1989 .

[25]  W. Carter,et al.  The morphological stability of continuous intergranular phases: Thermodynamic considerations , 1987 .