Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work

Robotics is a rapidly expanding area of digital innovation with important implications for organizational practice in multioccupational settings. This paper explores the influence of robotic innovations on the boundary dynamics of three different occupational groups—pharmacists, technicians, and assistants—working in a hospital pharmacy. We extend Pickering's tuning approach [Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago] to examine the temporally emergent process that entangled the mechanical elements and digital inscriptions of a dispensing robot with the everyday practices of hospital pharmacy work. We found that engagement with the robot's hybrid and dynamic materiality over time reconfigured boundary relations among the three occupational groups, with important and contradictory consequences for the pharmacy workers' skills, jurisdictions, status, and visibility.

[1]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  M. Burawoy.  Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism , 1982 .

[3]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks , 2007 .

[4]  Vivek S. Borkar,et al.  Manufacturing consent , 2010, 2010 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[5]  Karen Locke,et al.  Composing Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[6]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop 'Digital Challenges in Innovation Research' , 2010 .

[9]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[10]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[12]  E. Ferlie,et al.  The Nonspread of Innovations: the Mediating Role of Professionals , 2005 .

[13]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Things of Boundaries , 1995 .

[14]  Beth A. Bechky.  Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  David F. Noble,et al.  America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism by David F. Noble (review) , 1977 .

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Steven P. Vallas,et al.  Symbolic boundaries and the new division of labor: Engineers, workers and the restructuring of factory life , 2001 .

[18]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1982 .

[19]  A. Lanfranco,et al.  Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[20]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[21]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[22]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Communicating and Coordinating: Occasions for Information Technology in Loosely Coupled Organizations , 2006, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[23]  M. Lamont,et al.  The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[24]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[26]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[28]  Philip Kraft,et al.  The Routinizing of Computer Programming , 1979 .

[29]  S. Barley.  Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[30]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[31]  R. Sennett,et al.  The Craftsman , 2015, London.

[32]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Rhythmic human-robot social interaction , 2010 .

[33]  Yves Gendron,et al.  Professionalization in Action: Accountants' Attempt at Building a Network of Support for the Webtrust Seal of Assurance , 2004 .

[34]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[35]  W. Wiegand.  : The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1990 .

[36]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[37]  P. Adler,et al.  Automation and Skill: Three Generations of Research on the NC Case , 1989 .

[38]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Turn to the material: Remote diagnostics systems and new forms of boundary-spanning , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[39]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper- Middle Class. , 1992 .

[40]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[41]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[42]  Amin Rajan,et al.  In the age of the smart machine , 1990 .

[43]  R. Rice,et al.  Bringing social worlds together: computers as catalysts for new interactions in health care organizations. , 1992, Journal of health and social behavior.

[44]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Regula Valérie Burri,et al.  Doing Distinctions , 2008 .

[46]  A. Pickering.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[47]  W. Chismar,et al.  The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry , 2007 .

[48]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[49]  S. Kostof.  America by Design , 1987 .

[50]  Barbara Bigelow,et al.  Professionalizing and Masculinizing a Female Occupation: The Reconceptualization of Hospital Administration in the Early 1900s , 2005 .

[51]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[52]  Daniel Nyberg,et al.  Computers, Customer Service Operatives and Cyborgs: Intra-actions in Call Centres , 2009 .

[53]  Eivor Oborn,et al.  Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams , 2010 .

[54]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[55]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[57]  Andreas Wimmer,et al.  The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[58]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..