SIS epidemics on Triadic Random Graphs

It has been shown in the past that many real-world networks exhibit community structures and non-trivial clustering which comes with the occurrence of a notable number of triangular connections. Yet the influence of such connection patterns on the dynamics of disease transmission is not fully understood. In order to study their role in the context of Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) epidemics we use the Triadic Random Graph (TRG) model to construct small networks (N=49) from distinct, closed, directed triadic subpatterns. We compare various global properties of TRGs and use the N-intertwined mean-field approximation (NIMFA) model to perform numerical simulations of SIS-dynamics on TRGs. The results show that the infection spread on undirected TRGs displays very similar behavior to TRGs with an abundance of (directed) feed-back-loops, while using (directed) feed-forward-loops as network-entities significantly slows down the epidemic and lowers the number of infected individuals in the endemic state. Moreover, we introduce a novel stochastic approach for modelling the SIS-epidemics on TRGs based on characterizing nodes according to their set of $\left(k_{in},k_{out}\right)$ within triads. Within this model, the topology of the network is given by the number and the local structure of directed triadic motifs and not by the adjacency matrix. Nevertheless, the outcome of simulations is qualitatively similar to the results of the NIMFA model.

[1]  Rory Biggs,et al.  Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen , 2016 .

[2]  S. Snyder,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1999 .

[3]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[4]  Robert Cole,et al.  Computer Communications , 1982, Springer New York.

[5]  J. Flynn John,et al.  ESM Appendix B: Tseng ZJ and Flynn JJ. An integrative method for testing form–function linkages and reconstructed evolutionary pathways of masticatory specialization. Journal of the Royal Society Interface , 2015 .

[6]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[7]  E. Kandel,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Annual subject and author indexes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  ScienceDirect Bulletin of mathematical biology , 1973 .

[9]  J. A. Crowther Reports on Progress in Physics , 1941, Nature.

[10]  Margaret-Mary G. Wilson,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases. , 2003, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[11]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Triadic motifs and dyadic self-organization in the World Trade Network , 2012, IWSOS.

[12]  2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDM Workshops 2014, Shenzhen, China, December 14, 2014 , 2014, ICDM Workshops.

[13]  L. Christophorou Science , 2018, Emerging Dynamics: Science, Energy, Society and Values.

[14]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[15]  Harold G. Wolff,et al.  Social Science in Medicine , 1955, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[16]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Networks and the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease , 2010, Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases.