Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues.

We are currently seeing increasing opportunities to improve patient care with computed tomography (CT). At the same time, we are challenged to use this technology wisely. In particular, we are being asked to balance the benefits against the risks, chiefly those of ionizing radiation. To do this, we must have a foundation from which to determine the relative risks. This foundation necessarily must be composed of several components. First, it is important to understand the patterns of use and increasing application of CT, particularly multidetector CT. In addition, it is helpful to be familiar with measures of radiation pertinent to CT and the doses provided by this modality. This foundation then provides a context in which to discuss the issue of low-dose radiation and cancer risk as well as potential changes in CT practice guidelines and regulation. It is with an understanding of these issues that radiologists and other radiology personnel can participate in an informed discussion with referring physicians and patients and continue to optimize the practice of CT.

[1]  H. Greess,et al.  Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions , 2000, European Radiology.

[2]  R. Novelline,et al.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  E. Hall,et al.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[4]  D A Pierce,et al.  Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2000, Radiation research.

[5]  D. Frush.  Responsible use of CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  Strategies of dose reduction , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[8]  D. Frush,et al.  Data acquisition for pediatric CT angiography: problems and solutions , 2000, Pediatric Radiology.

[9]  D A Pierce,et al.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. , 1996, Radiation research.

[10]  Christoph R. Becker,et al.  Multidetector-row CT of the heart. , 2003 .

[11]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[12]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  R. Doll,et al.  100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897-1997. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  W Huda,et al.  Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations. , 2000, Medical physics.

[15]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish the radiation dose , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[16]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Single versus multi-detector row CT: comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[17]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Pediatric multidetector body CT. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[18]  J. K. Smith,et al.  Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  M. Charron,et al.  Is it really this simple? , 2003, Pediatric Radiology.

[20]  W. Berdon,et al.  Perfect is the enemy of the very good , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[21]  James H Thrall,et al.  Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. , 2003, Radiology.

[22]  M. Brant-Zawadzki.  CT screening: why I do it. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  H. McAdams,et al.  Multiplanar and three-dimensional imaging of the thorax. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[24]  D. Flum,et al.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[25]  A. Aschoff,et al.  Multi-detector row CT: is prospective electrocardiographic triggering improving the detection of small pulmonary tumors? , 2005, Academic radiology.

[26]  V. Tsapaki,et al.  Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[27]  E. Ron.  Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[28]  T H Shepard,et al.  National toxicology program. , 1981, Teratology.

[29]  B. Cohen,et al.  The cancer risk from low-level radiation. , 2002, Health physics.

[30]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. , 1999, Radiology.

[31]  A Workman,et al.  Application of draft European Commission reference levels to a regional CT dose survey. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[32]  David J. Brenner,et al.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[33]  J. V. Atherton,et al.  Energy imparted and effective doses in computed tomography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[34]  Yun Liang,et al.  Fundamentals of multichannel CT. , 2003, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[35]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  H. Morgan.  Dose reduction for CT pediatric imaging , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[37]  O. Linton,et al.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  J. Wade,et al.  CT standard protocols are of limited value in assessing actual patient dose. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[39]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  D. Feigal,et al.  FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. , 2002, International journal of trauma nursing.

[41]  L. Berlin.  Potential legal ramifications of whole-body CT screening: taking a peek into Pandora's box. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  Walter Huda,et al.  How do radiographic techniques affect image quality and patient doses in CT? , 2002, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[43]  Ulrich Baum,et al.  Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose) , 2002, European Radiology.