Examining barriers to health information technology adoption

Results of a previous study showed that use of health information technology (HIT) significantly reduced potential medication prescribing errors. However, the results also revealed a less than 100% rate of HIT adoption by primary care physicians. The current study reports on personal interviews with participating physicians that explored the barriers they faced when attempting to fully adopt a particular HIT. Content analysis of qualitative interviews revealed three barrier themes: time, technology, and environment. Interviews also revealed two other areas of concern; specifically, the compatibility of the HIT with the physician's patient mix and the physician's own attitude toward the use of HIT. A theoretical model of technology acceptance and use is used to discuss and further explain the data derived from the physician interviews. With a better understanding of these issues, health care administrators can develop successful strategies for adoption of HIT across their health care organizations.

[1]  Kimberly A. Galt,et al.  Impact of hand-held technologies on medication errors in primary care , 2002 .

[2]  G S Wagner,et al.  Evaluation of the efficacy of hand-held computer screens for cardiologists' interpretations of 12-lead electrocardiograms. , 1999, American heart journal.

[3]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[4]  Marilyn Sue Bogner,et al.  Human Error in Medicine , 1995 .

[5]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[6]  Bartholomew E. Clark,et al.  Physician Use of Hand-held Computers for Drug Information and Prescribing , 2005 .

[7]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  R. Vitolo,et al.  Easy Medic: an Internet application for the general practitioner , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[10]  Bartholomew E. Clark,et al.  The Impact of Personal Digital Assistant Devices on Medication Safety in Primary Care , 2005 .

[11]  M. Wiklund,et al.  Incorporating human factors into the design of medical devices. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  A. Donabedian.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. , 1966, The Milbank quarterly.

[13]  Glenn Hackbarth,et al.  Using quality incentives to drive physician adoption of health information technology. , 2005, Health affairs.

[14]  Bruce Houghton,et al.  Personal digital assistant-based drug information sources: potential to improve medication safety. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[15]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[16]  Preventing Medication Prescribing Errors , 1991, DICP : the annals of pharmacotherapy.

[17]  R T Brodell,et al.  Prescription errors. Legibility and drug name confusion. , 1997, Archives of family medicine.

[18]  J. Morse,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals , 1995 .

[19]  D. Bates.  Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  K. A. Galt.  Medication errors in ambulatory care , 2002 .

[21]  Cabral Jd.  Poor physician penmanship. , 1997 .

[22]  F J Overdyk,et al.  Patient-borne memory device facilitates "point of care" data access. , 1999, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[23]  D S Stein,et al.  Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. , 1997, JAMA.