Segmentation of the effective area of images of renal biopsy samples

Diagnosis and monitoring of kidney diseases and transplants is supported by microscopic analysis of needle-core biopsy samples. The current methods of analysis allow for inconsistencies, bias, and inaccuracies. We propose image processing methods for automatic segmentation of the effective biopsy area (cortex and medulla) from digital images of renal biopsy samples. The methods include opening-by-reconstruction, a morphological closing operation, and morphological erosion. The results are compared to 100 randomly selected images manually marked by an experienced renal pathologist. Comparative measures indicate that the automatically detected region of interest closely matches the ground truth; the mean distance to the closest point was 5.46 ± 3.92 µm (6 ± 4.31 pixels) and the true-positive fraction was 98.25 ± 1.77%.

[1]  T. Hovig,et al.  Computerized image analysis vs semiquantitative scoring in evaluation of kidney allograft fibrosis and prognosis. , 2004, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[2]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Juan Xu,et al.  Automated Optic Disk Boundary Detection by Modified Active Contour Model , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Computerized image analysis of Sirius Red-stained renal allograft biopsies as a surrogate marker to predict long-term allograft function. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[5]  F. Cosio,et al.  Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[6]  J. Nyengaard,et al.  Measurements of cortical interstitium in biopsies from human kidney grafts: how representative and how reproducible? , 2002, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[7]  Joseph P Grande,et al.  Correlation of Quantitative Digital Image Analysis with the Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chronic Allograft Nephropathy , 2004, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[8]  H. Isoniemi,et al.  HISTOLOGICAL CHRONIC ALLOGRAFT DAMAGE INDEX ACCURATELY PREDICTS CHRONIC RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION , 1994, Transplantation.

[9]  Ferran Marqués,et al.  Matehematic morphology approach for renal biopsy analysis , 2004, 2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference.

[10]  Günter Rote,et al.  Computing the Minimum Hausdorff Distance Between Two Point Sets on a Line Under Translation , 1991, Inf. Process. Lett..

[11]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[12]  G. Einecked,et al.  Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology : Updates and Future Directions , 2008 .