Effect of solution pH on SO2, NOx, and Hg removal from simulated coal combustion flue gas in an oxidant-enhanced wet scrubber

This paper presents a study on the simultaneous removal of SO2, NOx and Hg (both Hg0 and Hg2+) from a simulated flue gas by oxidant injection in a bench-simulated wet limestone scrubber for a wide range of slurry pH. The slurry pH strongly influenced the chemical mechanism in the scrubber and, therefore, affected pollutant removal. This paper also examines the potential ClO2(gas) reemission from a developed multipollutant scrubber at different slurry pHs. To better understand the chemical mechanisms at each slurry pH and to apply a mass balance to the process, detailed product ion analyses were performed for all experiments. Ion analysis covered three different chlorine species (chlorite, chloride, chlorate), sulfate, nitrite and nitrate. Different NOx removal efficiencies and mechanisms were found in acidic and alkaline pHs in the multipollutant scrubber. The acidic solution was favorable for NO and Hg0 oxidation, but increasing the slurry pH above 7.0 was disadvantageous for NO and Hg oxidation/removal. However, the rate of NOx absorption (by percentage) was higher for the alkaline solution. Implications This paper demonstrated a method for controlling multipollutant (SO2, NOx, Hg) emissions from a gas stream of a stationary combustion source in a wet limestone wet-FGD scrubber enhanced by an oxidizing additive. This paper explores how the flue gas conditions, especially the slurry pH, affect the chemical mechanisms of the multipollutant process and the pollutant removal efficiencies. The pH may be important when considering the location of oxidant injection into the scrubber/channel, where local parameters such as pH strongly vary. The usage of chlorite additive is potentially threatens ClO2(gas) emission; therefore, research in this area was also presented in this paper.

[1]  S. Gawłowski,et al.  Uwarunkowania i prognoza bezpieczeństwa energetycznego Polski na lata 2010-2110 , 2010 .

[2]  N. Hutson Mercury Capture on Fly Ash and Sorbents: The Effects of Coal Properties and Combustion Conditions , 2008 .

[3]  Renata Krzyżyńska,et al.  Simultaneous Removal of SO2, NOX, and Hg from Coal Flue Gas Using a NaClO2-Enhanced Wet Scrubber , 2008 .

[4]  Chuanmin Chen,et al.  Removal of Elemental Mercury by Sodium Chlorite Solution , 2008 .

[5]  Hyung-Keun Lee,et al.  Removal of NO from flue gas by aqueous chlorine-dioxide scrubbing solution in a lab-scale bubbling reactor. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  Nikolaos Koukouzas,et al.  Coal and sustainable energy supply challenges and barriers , 2008 .

[7]  Hyung-Keun Lee,et al.  Study on the removal of NO(x) from simulated flue gas using acidic NaClO2 solution. , 2008, Journal of environmental sciences.

[8]  Constance Senior Review of the role of aqueous chemistry in mercury removal by acid gas scrubbers on incinerator systems , 2007 .

[9]  K. Hein,et al.  Mercury emission control in coal-fired plants: The role of wet scrubbers , 2007 .

[10]  Steven A. Benson,et al.  Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants , 2003 .

[11]  I. Fábián,et al.  Unexpected Phenomena in the Mercury(II)−Chlorite Ion System: Formation and Kinetic Role of the HgClO2+ Complex , 2000 .

[12]  C. Brogren,et al.  Absorption of NO in an Aqueous Solution of NaClO2 , 1998 .

[13]  Sodium chlorite. , 1991, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[14]  Shelly Puleo US Environmental Protection Agency , 1982 .

[15]  H. Kumazawa,et al.  Absorption of lean NO in aqueous slurries of Ca(OH)2 with NaClO2 or Mg(OH)2 with NaClO2 , 1979 .

[16]  H. Kumazawa,et al.  AND NITRIC OXIDE IN AQUEOUS MIXED SOLUTIONS OF SODIUM CHLORITE AND SODIUM HYDROXIDE , 1978 .

[17]  James F. White,et al.  Chemistry of Chlorites , 1942 .

[18]  M. C. Taylor,et al.  SODIUM CHLORITE PROPERTIES AND REACTIONS , 1940 .