The Ability-Motivation-Opportunity Framework for Behavior Research in IS

Some theoretical models used in IS research may lack explanatory power and consistency because of their failure to provide an adequate means of accounting for contextual and situational factors which influence behavior. The ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) framework addresses these problems for important new areas of IS research by theorizing two of the most critical factors, ability and opportunity, as moderating influences on the link between motivation and behavior. The AMO framework also clarifies the function and meaning of motivation in theoretical models. In this paper, the origins and prior uses of the AMO framework are presented, its components and structure are explained, its place and purpose in the constellation of IS theories is discussed, theoretical and practical justifications for its use in IS behavioral research are presented, open theoretical issues and limitations regarding the AMO framework are identified, and recommendations for its operationalization in specific IS studies are offered

[1]  Gil Preuss,et al.  Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off , 2001 .

[2]  France Bélanger,et al.  The Effects of the Digital Divide on E-Government: An Emperical Evaluation , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[3]  Ajit Kambil,et al.  Consumer Behavior in Web-Based Commerce: An Empirical Study , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[4]  J. A. Bayton.  Motivation, Cognition, Learning—Basic Factors in Consumer Behavior , 1958 .

[5]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in research on human resource management and performance. Forthcoming (2005) - Human Resource Management Journal. , 2005 .

[6]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[7]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[8]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels , 1984 .

[9]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1989 .

[10]  G. Godin,et al.  A comparison of the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitudinal models for the prediction of exercise intention and behavior , 1988, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[11]  Heshan Sun,et al.  The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[13]  R. Vallerand.  Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1997 .

[14]  H C Triandis,et al.  Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[15]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[16]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[17]  Subhash Sharma,et al.  Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables , 1981 .

[18]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[19]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[20]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  Modeling IT Ethics: A Study in Situational Ethics , 1998, MIS Q..

[21]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[22]  S. Ramaswami,et al.  Electronic Channel Customers for Financial Products: Test of Ability-Motivation-Opportunity Model , 1998 .

[23]  Alexander M. Maish.  A User's Behavior Toward His MIS , 1979, MIS Q..

[24]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Troy J. Strader,et al.  Consumer Opportunity, Ability and Motivation as a Framework for Electronic Market Research , 1999, Electron. Mark..

[27]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[28]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..