Changes Over Time in Tree Cavity Availability Across Urban Habitats

[1]  K. Martin,et al.  Woodpeckers and other excavators maintain the diversity of cavity-nesting vertebrates. , 2021, The Journal of animal ecology.

[2]  I. Machar,et al.  Comparison of bird diversity between temperate floodplain forests and urban parks , 2021, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[3]  W. Halecki,et al.  The value of river valleys for restoring landscape features and the continuity of urban ecosystem functions – A review , 2021 .

[4]  B. Leung,et al.  Hotspots of pest-induced US urban tree death, 2020-2050 , 2021, bioRxiv.

[5]  C. Messier,et al.  The benefits of tree wounds: Microhabitat development in urban trees as affected by intensive tree maintenance , 2020 .

[6]  M. Ciach,et al.  Dead tree branches in urban forests and private gardens are key habitat components for woodpeckers in a city matrix , 2020 .

[7]  M. Freer,et al.  Cross Sector Partnerships – Development of the Chicago Region Trees Initiative , 2020, Cities and the Environment.

[8]  Lara A. Roman,et al.  Urban Tree Mortality: A Literature Review , 2019, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[9]  L. Bulluck,et al.  Spanning the habitat gradient: Red-headed woodpecker nest-site selection in three distinct cover types , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[10]  L. Hutyra,et al.  Live fast, die young: Accelerated growth, mortality, and turnover in street trees , 2019, PloS one.

[11]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Predicting abundance and diversity of tree-related microhabitats in Central European montane forests from common forest attributes , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[12]  J. M. LaMontagne,et al.  Tree cavity availability in urban cemeteries and city parks , 2019, Journal of Urban Ecology.

[13]  Marit L. Wilkerson,et al.  The role of socio-economic factors in planning and managing urban ecosystem services , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[14]  Niels Rueegger.  Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife – Trialling an alternative method to that of nest boxes , 2017 .

[15]  Casper W. Berg,et al.  glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling , 2017, R J..

[16]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management , 2017 .

[17]  J. Marzluff,et al.  Cavity nesting birds along an urban-wildland gradient: is human facilitation structuring the bird community? , 2017, Urban Ecosystems.

[18]  Andrejs Galenieks.  Importance of urban street tree policies: A Comparison of neighbouring Southern California cities , 2017 .

[19]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Biodiversity functions of urban cemeteries: Evidence from one of the largest Jewish cemeteries in Europe , 2016 .

[20]  J. Morgenroth,et al.  Diversification of the urban forest—Can we afford to exclude exotic tree species? , 2016 .

[21]  Elsa C. Anderson,et al.  Nest selection by red-headed woodpeckers across three spatial scales in an urban environment , 2016, Urban Ecosystems.

[22]  A. Nappi,et al.  How important is dead wood for woodpeckers foraging in eastern North American boreal forests , 2015 .

[23]  J. Fyles,et al.  Interspecific competition and nest survival of the threatened Red-headed Woodpecker , 2015, Journal of Ornithology.

[24]  S. Magle,et al.  Tree cavity availability across forest, park, and residential habitats in a highly urban area , 2015, Urban Ecosystems.

[25]  P. Tryjanowski,et al.  Urbanization Level and Woodland Size Are Major Drivers of Woodpecker Species Richness and Abundance , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  D. Herms,et al.  Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.

[27]  C. Ordóñez,et al.  An analysis of urban forest management plans in Canada: Implications for urban forest management , 2013 .

[28]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Hollow futures? Tree decline, lag effects and hollow‐dependent species , 2013 .

[29]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks , 2012 .

[30]  Kathy Martin,et al.  Linking fungi, trees, and hole-using birds in a Neotropical tree-cavity network: Pathways of cavity production and implications for conservation , 2012 .

[31]  T. Wesol̸owski.  “Lifespan” of woodpecker-made holes in a primeval temperate forest: A thirty year study , 2011 .

[32]  K. Martin,et al.  Woodpeckers, decay, and the future of cavity-nesting vertebrate communities worldwide , 2011 .

[33]  A. Lõhmus,et al.  Tree cavities in forests The broad distribution pattern of a keystone structure for biodiversity , 2011 .

[34]  M. Terho,et al.  Decay characteristics of hazardous Tilia, Betula, and Acer trees felled by municipal urban tree managers in the Helsinki City Area , 2008 .

[35]  D. McCullough,et al.  Factors Influencing Woodpecker Predation on Emerald Ash Borer , 2008 .

[36]  R. Russell,et al.  Habitat-Suitability Models for Cavity-Nesting Birds in a Postfire Landscape , 2007 .

[37]  K. Martin,et al.  The importance of excavators in hole-nesting communities: availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada , 2007, Journal of Ornithology.

[38]  Michael J. Raupp,et al.  Street Tree Diversity in Eastern North America and Its Potential for Tree Loss to Exotic Borers , 2006, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[39]  Therese M. Poland,et al.  Emerald Ash Borer: Invasion of the Urban Forest and the Threat to North America’s Ash Resource , 2006, Journal of Forestry.

[40]  J. Marzluff,et al.  EFFECTS OF URBAN SPRAWL ON SNAGS AND THE ABUNDANCE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF CAVITY-NESTING BIRDS , 2005 .

[41]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia , 2002 .

[42]  U. Mörtberg.  Resident bird species in urban forest remnants; landscape and habitat perspectives , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[43]  P. Chylarecki,et al.  Woodpeckers as Indicators of Forest Bird Diversity , 2001 .

[44]  K. Martin,et al.  Nest webs: A community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds , 1999 .

[45]  J. Verner,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE BREEDING ECOLOGY OF BIRDS NESTING IN BOXES AND TREE CAVITIES , 1997 .

[46]  R. Blair.  Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[47]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Effects of Urbanization on Avian Community Organization , 1982 .

[48]  T. Kunz,et al.  Ecology of Cavity and Foliage Roosting Bats , 2021 .

[49]  Xiaolu Zhou,et al.  Social disparities in tree canopy and park accessibility: A case study of six cities in Illinois using GIS and remote sensing , 2013 .

[50]  Y. Paillet,et al.  Influence of tree characteristics and forest management on tree microhabitats , 2011 .

[51]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[52]  E. G. McPherson,et al.  A practical approach to assessing structure, function, and value of street tree populations in small communities , 2003 .

[53]  Nobuhiko Kotaka,et al.  Secondary users of Great Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) nest cavities in urban and suburban forests in Sapporo City, northern Japan , 2002 .

[54]  M. Benedict,et al.  Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. , 2002 .

[55]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Practical Use of the Information-Theoretic Approach , 1998 .

[56]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Tree hollows as a resource for wildlife in remnant woodlands: spatial and temporal patterns across the northern plains of Victoria, Australia , 1994 .

[57]  Richard Brewer.  Ecological and Reproductive Relationships of Black-Capped and Carolina Chickadees , 1959 .