Quasi-static PEEC planar solver using a weighted combination of 2D and 3D analytical Green's functions and a predictive meshing generator

Abstract In this work, a quasi-static implementation of the partial element equivalent circuit (PEEC) method for the analysis of planar radiofrequency (RF) and microwave (uW) components is proposed. The procedure is divided in three parts. First, an alternative PEEC formulation based on energy concepts is described. Second, a smart mesh generator is developed in order to provide an accurate solution at minimum computational costs, taking into account both geometry and device physics as metrics for the correct sizing of mesh elements. And third, a weighted combination of the 2D and 3D quasi-static Green's functions (GF) is proposed for extending the valid frequency range of the quasi-static approximation. It is shown that the 3D-GF is very accurate at low frequency, whereas the 2D-GF is more suitable at higher frequencies. Numerical examples are compared to experimental data for different passive components and technologies in a wide frequency range.

[1]  J. Ekman,et al.  Impact of partial element accuracy on PEEC model stability , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  C. Hoer,et al.  Exact inductance equations for rectangular conductors with applications to more complicated geometries , 1965 .

[3]  Saiyd Ahyoune,et al.  1D/2D hybrid mesh PEEC solver for the analysis of multilayer planar circuits , 2017, 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Numerical Electromagnetic and Multiphysics Modeling and Optimization for RF, Microwave, and Terahertz Applications (NEMO).

[4]  Hai Lan,et al.  Accurate closed-form expressions for the frequency-dependent line parameters of on-chip interconnects on lossy silicon substrate , 2001, 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No.01CH37157).

[5]  A. Niknejad,et al.  Analysis of eddy-current losses over conductive substrates with applications to monolithic inductors and transformers , 2001 .

[6]  A. Orlandi,et al.  Internal impedance of conductors of rectangular cross section , 1999 .

[7]  Francisco V. Fernández,et al.  Extending the frequency range of quasi-static electromagnetic solvers , 2017, 2017 14th International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD).

[8]  A.C. Cangellaris,et al.  Investigation on the Frequency Range of Validity of Electroquasistatic RC Models for Semiconductor Substrate Coupling Modeling , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  A. Ruehli Equivalent Circuit Models for Three-Dimensional Multiconductor Systems , 1974 .

[10]  S. Ahyoune Heterogeneous Integration of RF and Microwave Systems Using Multi-layer Low-Temperature Co-fired Ceramics Technology , 2017 .

[11]  Kaustav Banerjee,et al.  Fast High-Frequency Impedance Extraction of Horizontal Interconnects and Inductors in 3-D ICs With Multiple Substrates , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[12]  Jun Imaoka,et al.  Evaluation of the Lagrangian Method for Deriving Equivalent Circuits of Integrated Magnetic Components: A Case Study Using the Integrated Winding Coupled Inductor , 2015 .

[13]  J. Sieiro,et al.  Ab initio adaptive meshing for planar passive component modeling , 2012, 2012 42nd European Microwave Conference.

[14]  Danesh Daroui,et al.  PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PARALLEL NON- ORTHOGONAL PEEC-BASED SOLVER FOR EMC APPLICATIONS , 2012 .

[15]  Veysel Demir,et al.  Microstrip conductor loss models for electromagnetic analysis , 2003 .

[16]  Lijun Jiang,et al.  Skin-Effect Loss Models for Time- and Frequency-Domain PEEC Solver , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Peter Scholz Analysis and Numerical Modeling of Inductively Coupled Antenna Systems , 2010 .